Don
Where you heading?
This is the point I find most objectionable....
No two candidates are equally qualified (and suitable) for a job.
How this actually works are standards are lowered and if a "diversity" candidate meets the lowered standards they are deemed "equally qualified" as the competition and given the nod over better suited/qualified candidates.
As this article highlights the police were only found out because they screwed over an especially well qualified candidate on this occasion.
I find your view rather odd.
Why?
Snip!
As for medicine.
One of the most important things is Language. English is an easy language to learn but a very hard one to master. As regards "Foreign" doctors, unless he is a "House", I want one who I can understand and who can understand me, otherwise, things are likely to end badly!
Years ago I saw this happen myself. Obviously I can't confirm 100% that is what happened, but when I was 24/25 I really wanted to be a postman, I applied for a few posts and always made it to interview and smashed it.
I was never given the job and could never understand why, I was young, fit, intelligent etc and I knew for a fact that only 3 or 4 people were interviewed. I was exactly what I thought they were looking for.
Few weeks afer the job interview, it hit me why when I saw our two new local delivery workers, a 40-50 year old somalian man and a muslim woman. So much for white privilege!
At that point I had enough of the blatant racism /sexism and knew I was never going to get anywhere in a borough such as Harrow, the most ethnically diverse borough in the UK obsessed with appeasing minorities and hitting targets to look good. So I retrained to be a registered nurse, where I would be in the minority and seen as something different/unique as a white man. That was 7 years ago and it's the best thing I ever did, I've been offered every single job I interviewed for within 1 hr of interviewing and currently awaiting my 189 visa to come through, then I am out of this **** hole.
This is the result of putting quotas on these kind of issues. Companies, and the police in this case, are more worried about the quota than maintaining a high standard.
I don't think the police have ever been worried about maintaining any standard tbh. They are a joke in this country.
Unless you hand them every piece of evidence for a conviction they will let things just go. They don't have time to work any cases just turn up to calls write them up and file them. They never get a second look in again.
They wern't always like that though, we used to have a very good police force. Maybe the best.
But even if you hand them all the leads they can't be bothered. A friend had a laptop stolen which was in his car that got stolen. He found it on ebay, had a photo showing the serial number AND the seller's address. They did nothing...
If they had said no, they would have been sent to the gulag all the sooner. Tyranny does not tolerate dissent.
diversity.
The biggest minority in the world is the individual.
By the time the Bolsheviks were in charge, the time for effective resistance had passed. It's all very well saying there were tens of millions of people who should have resisted, but how exactly does one organise when the government has an iron grip on all means of communication, and has agents and true-believers among the population who will report your dissent to the authorities? The soviet government needed slave labour for their gulags, and while they didn't really need a reason to send you there, having an excuse didn't hurt.No, what I mean is if people had of stood up against what was happening. What's more, the socialist/communist system is an utter failure. It sounds wonderful, evokes a sense of community, progress, well-being a prosperity to come. The issue is the communist system particularly does not allow private property and therefore as Mises correctly points out it would fail.
Socialist systems operate very much the same model. The problem is with socialism that eventually you run out of other peoples money. That's when things get nasty and it does happen.
Back to the point. Imagine if the 25-45million who died in Stalins USSR had combined? Imagine these numbers added to the tens of millions more who were condemned to years of a slow starvation, death and torture at the hands of the state. Thus lies the issue that statism under an all encompassing system I.e. Socialism brooks no dissent and that is where we tie back into your response.
By the time the Bolsheviks were in charge, the time for effective resistance had passed
all very well saying there were tens of millions of people who should have resisted, but how exactly does one organise when the government has an iron grip on all means of communication
and has agents and true-believers among the population who will report your dissent to the authorities?
The soviet government needed slave labour for their gulags, and while they didn't really need a reason to send you there, having an excuse didn't hurt.
I was once lecturered once by a very middle class white woman who said that as a white man I enjoyed unearned privilege and any achievement I had was due to unfair advantage.
When I told her that my dad had lived in abject poverty in a single parent family in the 50s, to the point he had to approach a local Christian group for shoes as a 9 year old, and that he excelled due to his work ethic and love of learning, she still maintained I was still an oppressor.
I walked away from that discussion.
Very weird. If the police force was his 'dream job', why did he bother taking a degree in two fields completely unrelated to law enforcement?
'Hi, I'd like to join the army. It's my dream job!'
'OK, what's your background? Any related experience or qualifications?'
'Yes! I carefully prepared for this role by taking a degree in classical Greek literature at the University of Wolverhampton.'
'Perfect, welcome to HM armed forces!'
Not sure why that is weird