Why is it when people want to rate a players year or season they ONLY consider the good things. Again I'll point out that Suarez only scored 1/3 of his goals in the 2014 part of the season for Liverpool. He had a great 2013, and an OKAY 2014 for Liverpool, but he also failed to score against big teams repeatedly and it wasn't for lack of chances. He was ineffective against the big sides often when his team was dominating and had he scored less against Cardiff, Norwich and others and more against Chelsea and City they'd have won the title. But again Suarez did pretty much the worst thing of the season as well. You're not factoring that in at all. He had a decent time with Liverpool but the most ridiculous attack and second worst ban of the year(Brandao managed to almost make Suarez look normal by comparison) work against each other. He's had a poor time since the end of last season.
When jotting up things that make Suarez great or not, he has more negatives than positives. He was not the 6th best player in the world in 2014, he wasn't top 30. A player who would rank 2nd for most ridiculous assault on a pitch(okay in leagues people watch, there have been other insane assaults also in lower leagues, non league and youth football). So lets say second for most ridiculous assault/worst ban in the top leagues of the year isn't going to be 6th on the best player of all year unless he outscored everyone else by 30 goals and won everything to counter balance the negative parts of his season.
