Hi all,
I've got a client who's concerned by the fact that the total items that ESM shows in their mailbox is vastly more than they think they have emails in their mailbox.
I personally think that ESM considers calender items and contacts as items as well possibly and that is why the numbers don't match up.
They are annoyed that they are reaching their DB size limit and don't think it's because they have too many emails so they want me to prove why there is a difference in the figures.
Am I right in thinking that the total mailbox items in ESM includes contacts and calendar entries? If so is there any KB or anything that I can show them to prove it as they don't seem to want to take my word for it.
IF I'm wrong, then does anyone know why there would be such a diffeence in the numbers?
Also does anyone know how to get Outlook 2003 to show how many items they have in their mailbox in total so that they can see it in both places? I know I can show them each folder and how many items their are, but they have hundreds of subfolders so I'd be there all day.
Hey maybe subfolders count as items! lol
I'm on site with them tomorrow and they are bound to bring it up so if anyone has any concrete proof of what total items is made up of that would be awesome.
/edit just to clarify the mailbox SIZES are the same in both places, but in Outlook they believe they have much less emails that ESM shows total items.
Thanks,
G
I've got a client who's concerned by the fact that the total items that ESM shows in their mailbox is vastly more than they think they have emails in their mailbox.
I personally think that ESM considers calender items and contacts as items as well possibly and that is why the numbers don't match up.
They are annoyed that they are reaching their DB size limit and don't think it's because they have too many emails so they want me to prove why there is a difference in the figures.
Am I right in thinking that the total mailbox items in ESM includes contacts and calendar entries? If so is there any KB or anything that I can show them to prove it as they don't seem to want to take my word for it.
IF I'm wrong, then does anyone know why there would be such a diffeence in the numbers?
Also does anyone know how to get Outlook 2003 to show how many items they have in their mailbox in total so that they can see it in both places? I know I can show them each folder and how many items their are, but they have hundreds of subfolders so I'd be there all day.
Hey maybe subfolders count as items! lol
I'm on site with them tomorrow and they are bound to bring it up so if anyone has any concrete proof of what total items is made up of that would be awesome.
/edit just to clarify the mailbox SIZES are the same in both places, but in Outlook they believe they have much less emails that ESM shows total items.
Thanks,
G
Last edited: