Touchscreen on a mouse?!

That looks terrible to use tbh.

More software bloat but I'm guessing they'll just want to be able to charge on their own app store. That use time is really poor too.
 
fraps said:
135g is ridiculous in 2025. You have companies releasing sub 30g.
Click to expand...
Have no interest in this mouse, can't see the point in the screen and it otherwise just looks like an MX Master clone.

I do find it funny though that we've gone from mice that had extra optional weights that you stick in the bottom, to "oh noooo, over 50g" :D (I have a g502 lightspeed and an MX master, both in the roughly 130-150g range and find them fine)
 
Adding weight makes the really tiny movements more accurate. I think the push for lightness might come from manufacturers wanting to use less materials :D

This thing just looks uncomfortable and just pointless. Also who wants a wireless mouse for gaming, it introduces input delay and you have to recharge it.
 
Last edited:
Nasher said:
Adding weight makes the really tiny movements more accurate. I think the push for lightness might come from manufacturers wanting to use less materials :D

This thing just looks uncomfortable and just pointless. Also who wants a wireless mouse for gaming, it introduces input delay and you have to recharge it.
Click to expand...
I think its more over Bluetooth there is a larger input delay compared to USB receiver. But yes they do need charging
 
As for weight. Really, I don't see the issue, personally. I've been gaming and working on PCs for 25+ years, I prefer a weighty mouse and 135g isn't exactly heavy.
I'm sure these companies would love to sell you a light mouse though, it'll be cheaper to produce. Gamer chumps will see lighter = super pro 360 no scope edition and will pay more for it.

It'll still sell though, gamer chumps will buy it because reasons.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom