Toyota and Lexus - Same company different attitude to customers

Associate
Joined
1 Nov 2003
Posts
1,258
Location
Maidstone, Kent
For over 25 years now I have purchased either Toyota or Lexus vehicles. I like the reliability and I am too old for hooning around, I need something for light off-road use, and with significant cargo space, so their RAV4's and RX's meet my requirements.

My financial position means I cannot afford a brand new Lexus but, due to the excellent reliability, I have purchased (over the years) 4 second hand Lexus's (Lexi??) all of which have served me well.

Last year, I was in a position to purchase a new vehicle. I was tempted by a newer second hand Lexus RX, but realised I could purchase a new Toyota. I bought a RAV4.

Recently, I received an email from my local Toyota dealer inviting me to purchase "Protection Plates". After googling this I learnt that car thieves are now targeting RAV4s and some Lexus models, then by-passing their security via connecting a box of tricks to the cars CANBUS system, accessed via the front headlight. There are videos on line showing how easy this is and cars being driven away in around 2 minutes with the thieves gaining entry and taking the car electronically. It is very scary how quick and easy this seems to be!

Anyway, these "Protection Plates" are designed to prevent the thieves gaining easy access to the connection needed to connect to the CANBUS.

The Toyota dealer wanted to charge me £70 to fit these. Apparently Toyota are happy to provide the parts FOC, but the labour comes down to the customer. This involves removing the front bumper and headlights so I understand.

What I find disappointing is that owners of the Lexus models with are also affected by this security flaw are being contacted by Lexus and offered the "Protection Plates" supplied and fitted FOC.

When you consider that Toyota and Lexus are the same company this seems unfair and has left a rather unpleasant taste.

I contacted Toyota UK and asked for an explanation. I was told that "Both brands, Toyota and Lexus, have made separate commercial decisions..."

Now, I may understand this if the cars in question were the cheaper end of Toyota's range. After all they are looking to make a profit. But I believe the RAV4 is at their higher end, when optional extras are added it is easily possible to have a RAV4 cost equivalent, or even more, than a similar Lexus.

I am getting towards retirement age, and my plan was to use part of my retirement package to buy a new Land Cruiser. I'm now feeling this is something I'm probably not going to do, as it appears to me that Toyota don't value their customers and only see them as ways to get additional income.

Of course, I could still buy Lexus but, as they are owned by Toyota, this is something I am also now unsure about.

Is it me, or is this decision by Toyota somewhat foolish and short-sighted? After all, for the sake of £70 (the actual labour cost to Toyota would be significantly less), they have now alienated and disappointed me, and possibly other customers, and put in jeopardy my on-going brand loyalty and future purchases.

Be interested to hear the wisdom of the OCUK motors community on this.
 
GC123 sums up my point of view on this well. There is a clear flaw here. One which apparently can be fixed for less than £70 but Toyota seem unwilling to do this. I wonder how many Toyota / Lexus owners will look at others options for their next purchase. I know I will be.
 
Last edited:
It's a difficult one, hence why I asked for the advice on here. Some days I thought, "No problem, it is what it is," other days I was, "Stuff this- your fault Toyota, do the right thing and provide and fit the parts FOC."

£70 isn't the end of the world. It's just that, to me, this is a fault that should be covered FOC.

You don't (well, I didn't) expect such issues on a £40K plus vehicle, and then to see that I'm expected to pay for this to be rectified myself is annoying.

Some very sound comments on here. Thanks for all who took the time to contribute.

As Lordrobs stated, "You have stated yourself that you have over 25 years of good service and products from the brands, to go elsewhere because of the cost of an optional upgrade to the security of your car would be cutting off your nose to spite your face." Perhaps I am?

This makes sense to me too,

"I'd personally move on, it's £70... Not worth wasting the time and negative energy thinking about it any further or seeking validation." Thanks, iGiDK.

I think I'll buy Lexus next time. :)
 
Last edited:
Their plan has worked ;) :D

But has it?

I'm not an expert in such things but I would assume the profits on a new car are greater than a second-hand one (in this instance, I mean). If I now only buy second-hand Lexus, surely I'm giving them less money and then expecting/getting the premium customer service?

Have you tried another Toyota dealer?

Yes, it appears to be Toyota "policy" the other dealer in the area wanted to charge the same too.
 
Last edited:
This isn't an OBD attack though.

I assume for an OBD attack the thieves need to gain entry to the interior of the vehicle via brute force?

I fully appreciate if a scumbag wants my car, no matter what I do, they will get it.
 
Last edited:
They can unlock it with a relay and then plug a laptop in.

One my neighbours had their Merc opened even though their key was in a metal tin (so no signal getting out). So it seems like some models may have actually been fully cracked now. Which was only a matter of time. Wireless stuff is never secure for long.

When not in use, my car keys are kept in a faraday pouch though...more secure than a metal tin??

My understanding is that such measures prevent relay attacks?

I am happy to be corrected if this isn't the case?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom