• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

TressFX 3.0 Document "Anyone Interested"

Looks like a big improvement on the original but kind of lacks "sheen"/gloss the lighting is very dull making it look more like strands of crepe paper.
 
It's good that they've already got 2 games announced. Whether it's been any good or not in the past has been largely irrelevant due to lack of games implementing it. They had 1 big title?

So to have 2 at this stage is good. I think AMD need to get a bit better at pushing their technologies.
 
I like the looks of it. I just hope they focus on proper performance of it.

EDIT: that was a total brain fart :(
 
Last edited:
UBI Soft behind which game? both of the ones in question are produced by Square Enix/Eidos Montreal.

(I'd say thank goodness but DX HR did have some low level stutter even though the performance was general excellent on paper - so hope they can avoid that with future DX titles).
 
shankly1985 said:
Ubisoft? Square enix
Click to expand...

Rroff said:
UBI Soft behind which game? both of the ones in question are produced by Square Enix/Eidos Montreal.

(I'd say thank goodness but DX HR did have some low level stutter even though the performance was general excellent on paper - so hope they can avoid that with future DX titles).
Click to expand...

Yeah sorry i was having a brain fart :).. my bad..
 
This might be a good place to ask about this.

I got the TressFX 2.2 SDK from AMD's SDK libraries weeks ago, i have never been able to get it to run.

What seems to be happening is: it is running in the background (As you can see in the Aero Window) but the window will not display.

Win 8.1 x64
15.4

 
Looking forward to this and guess what ? If it runs like crap on Nvidia hardware because it's AMD tech, I'm not going to start moaning like a baby who just lost his dummy I'll just turn it off :p
 
I don't care too much, if anything it should be optimized better and not drain performance as much as the original did so that we can actually use it.
 
I thought it was rubbish in Tomb Raider. It looked awful and moved nothing like real hair. Hopefully they've refined it a bit since then.
 
Aretak said:
I thought it was rubbish in Tomb Raider. It looked awful and moved nothing like real hair. Hopefully they've refined it a bit since then.
Click to expand...

Both TressFX and Hairworks aren't realistic imo, it's better than static hair that doesn't move but it's still a long way off representing how hair actually moves. Probably don't have the compute power to do it properly yet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom