In my hunt for a 4 door saloon, had a look at an ATR yesterday, thought I might aswell mention the results.
As a background, I have to replace my MX5 with something with 4 doors and seats. Needs to be around Mundano sized to cater for the forthcoming requirement for a baby seat, but can't stretch to a 5 series as she thinks it's too big (we've tried one).
The best thing we've seen to date is a 330i, which did many things VERY well. The only thing that got me was that it felt a little lardy when compared to my MX5. It did strike me that something that is designed to be more direct such as an Impreza or ATR might satiate those desires. I tried the Impreza a couple of weeks back and it just didn't do it for me, so yesterday was the ATR.
Upfront, I have to say that if I only had the £5k that the ATR was, I'd probably buy it out of hand as I'm sure if would be a lot better than the equivalently priced BM, however, funding is not a massive issue, so yes I am seriously comparing the two on straight ability.
The ATR really was slightly more direct and the engine was completely manic, though rather hard edged in it's sound. Against other similar options it would be a bit of a no-brainer, as there is very little that it actually competes with.
The problems were that the interior really did feel like a late 90s Japanese car, particularly so the fake carbon fibre trim, though the steering wheel was nice to hold.
The engine was actually worse than I expected. I remember some graphs of power/torque on these forums, implying that Type-Rs had a very linear torque spread over a very wide band. Clearly Honda forgot about it on this as it really did seem to have another 30% more above 5500rpm. So it would feel completely off the boil unless you seriously ragged it. Maybe I'm getting too old...
The steering was the other key thing, as to me that's vital in a good performance car. For me, was a little too heavy at low speeds and then developed it's own torque steer weave (not big, but definitely noticeable) when the real power band cut in. That sounds a little damning, but being fair, the steering was a good deal better than most performance fwd cars (murders a Cupra), just not as good as the BM.
So all in all, simply not in the same league as the 330i. Oh well, time to get back on PH to find the right motor.
As a background, I have to replace my MX5 with something with 4 doors and seats. Needs to be around Mundano sized to cater for the forthcoming requirement for a baby seat, but can't stretch to a 5 series as she thinks it's too big (we've tried one).
The best thing we've seen to date is a 330i, which did many things VERY well. The only thing that got me was that it felt a little lardy when compared to my MX5. It did strike me that something that is designed to be more direct such as an Impreza or ATR might satiate those desires. I tried the Impreza a couple of weeks back and it just didn't do it for me, so yesterday was the ATR.
Upfront, I have to say that if I only had the £5k that the ATR was, I'd probably buy it out of hand as I'm sure if would be a lot better than the equivalently priced BM, however, funding is not a massive issue, so yes I am seriously comparing the two on straight ability.
The ATR really was slightly more direct and the engine was completely manic, though rather hard edged in it's sound. Against other similar options it would be a bit of a no-brainer, as there is very little that it actually competes with.
The problems were that the interior really did feel like a late 90s Japanese car, particularly so the fake carbon fibre trim, though the steering wheel was nice to hold.
The engine was actually worse than I expected. I remember some graphs of power/torque on these forums, implying that Type-Rs had a very linear torque spread over a very wide band. Clearly Honda forgot about it on this as it really did seem to have another 30% more above 5500rpm. So it would feel completely off the boil unless you seriously ragged it. Maybe I'm getting too old...
The steering was the other key thing, as to me that's vital in a good performance car. For me, was a little too heavy at low speeds and then developed it's own torque steer weave (not big, but definitely noticeable) when the real power band cut in. That sounds a little damning, but being fair, the steering was a good deal better than most performance fwd cars (murders a Cupra), just not as good as the BM.
So all in all, simply not in the same league as the 330i. Oh well, time to get back on PH to find the right motor.