I've got a Hama Star 63 which can be had for £10 from a competitor and I can't fault it (I've not known anything different). What is it all these more expensive tripods do that mine doesn't!
The head seems solid and won't budge once I've tightened unless I put a lot more force than any camera would on it, full adjustable legs, spirit level and it seems sturdy enough. The position of the head handle isn't great, but I could see no reason to spend more money. Have I missed something?![]()
Go for the deal on the Redsnapper tripod & head . £72 posted

cheers for the comments guys, think the wallet is going to take a beating again![]()
Go for the deal on the Redsnapper tripod & head . £72 posted