Turning off System Restore...

Negative. Turning System Restore off is one of the first things I do with a new install.

Negative+

Leaving it on has no performance hit in real world usage and serves as an Excellent return point should a driver update prove to be problematic or a Windows Update faulty (which does happen occasionally) or user error renders Windows unbootable at which point a pre-boot system restore can bring it back to life without having to reinstall the OS.

The statement that SR is bad belongs in the same boat with statements made by people about MS being bad and Vista being bad and slow etc etc.
 
What's the benefit of having it off if there's a balance? :p It's not a realtime running service and is only activated during system changes or software installation that modifies system files (drivers included) and does not change files in the user's document folders so all benefits point to it being left on rather than off!

I never make user (since moving from XP) errors which is why I've never had to use SR on Vista yet (had it since release day) but I still have it on Just in case even though I am 100% confident in my ability to not make a mistake or install something that could damage a component of Vista!
 
System Restore can be and has been a life saver.
All it needs to do is save you a system reinstall once and it's worth keeping.

As said above, it takes up no system resources (except a few GB of storage and we can all spare some of that).
 
Leave it on.

Recently thought I would be smart and left it off after playing around then could not boot into Vista so had to reinstall again from scratch as could not get into the desktop.

Only time it is pointless is if you have a dual boot with XP apparently it will not work at all if you try to restore Vista which sucks but its a bad mistake from MS.
 
Back
Top Bottom