Twin turbo Ford GT anyone?

So would this beast have even worse fuel economy?

how many gallons to the mile does it do? :)

93 octane? A bit low aint it?
 
I think 93 is the best you can get in the US. 89 is regular and 92 is premium if memory serves
 
Squark said:
93 octane? A bit low aint it?

93PON octane on the scale the US uses is the same as 97RON on the scale we use I think. I think this discussion came up in another thread the other night :)
 
Jonny69 said:
I think 93 is the best you can get in the US. 89 is regular and 92 is premium if memory serves

Whats the matter? Dont yanks like refined petrol?

Still a beast of a motor
 
Squark said:
Ok, you didnt have to put it quite so rudely but nevermind

lesson learnt

That wasn't me putting it rudely....had I really put it rudely I would have a little PermaBan to play with :) But if you really were offended, then I apologise.
 
Nicola said:
jtgt03.gif
:eek:
 
brocksta said:
:eek: *drools* :eek:

how much it cost to do that you reckon?

In all honesty I doubt it costs that much relative to the cost of the car, if you are prepared to do all the fabrication work yourself costs would be low, you can pick up a pair of GT35R's for around 2 and a half k from the states and most decent standalone ecu's such as the Omex 710 system will be suitable for up to 12 cylinder engines anyway, or do what a lot of people do and use 2 cheaper ecu's with MAP input, one ecu per bank. basically treating the v8 engine as two four cylinder engines, so you can use even cheaper ecu's that can only manage 4 cylinders max.
I'm willing to bet that the original ecu has enough scope to manage a turbo charger setup anyway, as it already must have an input for manifold pressure to manage a supercharger setup, whether its map sensor can cope with 25+ psi and whether the guys can find the software to remap the ford ecu is another matter :)
Dont forget those ford v8's are cheap to tune, so much off the shelf stuff available for beefing up the bottom end if needed!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom