Type 45 Daring class destroyer

Associate
Joined
30 Sep 2008
Posts
2,112
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7848174.stm

HMS Daring, the first of six Type 45 Anti Air Warfare Destroyers in production for the Royal Navy, has docked at its home port of Portsmouth for the first time.

It has been hailed by its creators as the most powerful and advanced vessel of its kind.

As a class of warship, destroyers have historically been small, agile ships designed to protect larger, slower convoys and strike groups from airborne and naval threats.

Since the end of World War II, destroyers have steadily grown, both in size and in terms of firepower.

HMS Daring is no exception to this trend. The Type 45 destroyer's primary mission is air defence, a role that its arsenal reflects.

The Principal Anti Air Missile System (Paams) is the Type 45's primary weapons platform and is designed to combat enemy missile attacks on ships.

Paams consists of a 48-cell vertical missile launcher that allows the destroyer to engage targets from 360 degrees.

The missiles themselves are a mix of Aster 15s and Aster 30s, which can strike targets at distances of up to 30km (19 miles) and 100km (62 miles) respectively.

They are radar-guided by the Sampson phased-array radar system perched, like the head of a snowman, atop the Type 45's mast.

The radar suite on the Type 45 can track targets for hundreds of miles around, on the sea and in the air.


*************************
For people like me who love military programs, this is great news. By 2012 we should have 6 of these patroling our waters.

Its a pity we have to spread the two new super carriers over an extra couple of years to help the budget deficit but with the F-35 having massive delivery date & budget problems anyway, that may not be such a bad thing.
 
We spend a very small % of our GPD on military programs (around 2.5%). Two new super carriers will cost around £3.9 billion (but lets say 5bill because they never deliver on time or budget). I.D cards = 20 billion. New NHS patient software is not even ready & will cost 6-7 billion with current problems.
 
i personally think the projects like the Eurofighter Consortium should be used on all future European projects, i.e tank, destroyers, carriers, personal carriers.

Obviously the Eurofighter project had its problems with political infighting and work loads share but it was a first so....imagine if the top 10 EU countries were all operating the Challenger 2 tank. The more made the less they cost
 
F-35A - conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) variant intended for the US Air Force and other air forces.

The F-35B is the short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) variant of the aircraft. Similar in size to the A variant, the B sacrifices some fuel volume to make room for the vertical flight system.

The F-35C carrier variant will have a larger, folding wing and larger control surfaces for improved low-speed control, and stronger landing gear for the stresses of carrier landings.
The United States Navy will be the sole user for the carrier variant.


This is partly why the JSF program is the most exensive ever made.
Eurofighter is twin engined and far more agile in close combat (within visual range) but people argue the F-35 would detect EF first, fire its missile(s) & run off. It is a bomber so maybe not fair to compare the two. We have the EU for air superiority.
 
Last edited:
Plan B is still a possibility if we bail out of the JSF program.

"Planned 150 British aircraft rise from the original £9 billion estimate to £15 billion. Britain has already paid out £2.5 billion in preliminary costs but next spring (2009) must start paying for actual aircraft. At that point it is committed to the entire project whatever the price"

"Once full production begins, Britain will be paying more than £1 billion a year for the aircraft, exacerbating the already dire state of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) budget"

BUT.....

If we go to plan B: Navalised Typhoon, as per other comments would require improvement in landing gear, possibly a steam pully system (same as American carriers) so it can take off & land. Would be very expensive indeed. I very much dout the UK will pull out of the JSF program because of the UK/US relations, political fallout, BAE workload & sunk cost we have already invested.
 
Back
Top Bottom