Unigine Heaven 4 benchmark

[Floob]

AMD RX 6700 (Non-XT) mV=1050 Clock 2500MHz-2600MHz VRAM- 2112MHz
AMD 5600X (Stock)

 

[mrk]

In full screen mode it wouldn't let me screenshot for some reason so had to rerun in Windowed mode. The full csreen mode max fps was over 500, but windowed mode was as you see, so score affected slightly it seems but oh well. Realise also that back then this demo looked so good, but compared to modern games it looks so pants lol.




12700KF @ Stock
3080 Ti FE undervolted (boost @ 0.9v @ 1785 core / 9501 mem)

 

[Kaapstad]

Scoreboard updated.

 

[dvinell]

No, just no.

 

[kawarius]

4090@3015mhz/stock mem
5900X@PBO, probably bottlenecking a lot
522.25

 

[Jay-G25]

4090@3015mhz/stock mem
5900X@PBO, probably bottlenecking a lot
522.25

Yep same as mine , poor CPU is choked to death

10900K @ 5.3Ghz
4090 @ 3135Mhz / 6001Mhz

 

[kawarius]

Yep same as mine , poor CPU is choked to death

10900K @ 5.3Ghz
4090 @ 3135Mhz / 6001Mhz

Honestly, was expecting the 10900k at those clocks to beat out the 5900X pretty good gpu clocks though. Mine starts to freak out at 3060mhz

 

[Kaapstad]

Scoreboard updated.

 

[Jay-G25]

Honestly, was expecting the 10900k at those clocks to beat out the 5900X pretty good gpu clocks though. Mine starts to freak out at 3060mhz

Yeah 10900K is a bit old now , eyeing up a 13900k in a few weeks time although i wouldn't mind waiting till next year when 14th gen is out so i at least get a bit longer on the new socket or may even look at AMD with the 3D versions of the 7000 series cpu , decisions decisions

It just about does ok at 4k though as nowhere near as choked as when at 1080p

10900K @ 5.3 Ghz
4090 @ 3135Mhz / 6001Mhz

Score : 3204

 

[Cob]

6700xt @ 2845mhz / mem @ 2150mhz
5600x @ PBO +100mhz
Arch linux kernel 6.0.1-zen2-1-zen

 

[Kaapstad]

Scoreboard updated.

 

[wookiee87]

see how far i could push my 6900xtu LD

7950x @ stock speed
6900xtu LD core @ 2770mhz / mem @ 2150mhz
driver 22.9.2

 

[wookiee87]

4090@3015mhz/stock mem
5900X@PBO, probably bottlenecking a lot
522.25

i dont mean to rain on your parade but was 8xaa enabled, i dont see it in your screenshot?, those 4090 scores are mighty impressive never the less

 

[Jay-G25]

i dont mean to rain on your parade but was 8xaa enabled, i dont see it in your screenshot?, those 4090 scores are mighty impressive never the less

Good spot , didn't notice that... maybe the 10900k isn't so bad after all

 

[Jay-G25]

4090@3015mhz/stock mem
5900X@PBO, probably bottlenecking a lot
522.25

This is not for the score board but this is what a 10900k gets using the same settings without 8xAA

 

[kawarius]

This is not for the score board but this is what a 10900k gets using the same settings without 8xAA

Good question to be honest guys, my bad if I didn't spot it. I'll rerun/double check when I get home today

 

[Kaapstad]

Scoreboard updated.

 

[balanceballs]

AMD Ryzen 7 5800x at stock speeds
Founders 3060TI at stock (reporting as GPU 1410, Memory 1750)
Nvidia drivers 522.25.

Score seems a bit low compared to similar systems. But I only just built this PC

 

[Kaapstad]

AMD Ryzen 7 5800x at stock speeds
Founders 3060TI at stock (reporting as GPU 1410, Memory 1750)
Nvidia drivers 522.25.

Score seems a bit low compared to similar systems. But I only just built this PC

For the scoreboard we need the results shot over the cobblestones.

 

[balanceballs]

For the scoreboard we need the results shot over the cobblestones.

Apologies, I have updated my screenshot with a new result (a few points less, too)