Saw this today on the BBC:
tl;dr (or I guess dw: "didn't watch"):
woman is unemployed
she's not disabled
she could get a job but is worried she might do something wrong and lose it or something???
woman moves in with boyfriend
claims universal credit
gets offered a cash advance/loan by the job centre
loan is flexible, doesn't have to take full amount
loan is there to cover the 5 weeks before UC kicks in
loan is to be paid back out of future benefits
opts to take full amount, treats herself - gets new phone etc...
...
"Oh no, have no money now"
needs to use food bank
has to ask to have the repayments extended
apparently plenty of case
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/stori...-went-wild-and-it-hit-me-like-a-ton-of-bricks
Granted the issue with the lump sum payments is a temporary/short term one related to the transfer but I do wonder how much "nanny state" intervention might be needed here.
While I don't like the idea of the state micro managing people's lives some of these people are just complete and utter **** ups. When you've got long term unemployed people like that then maybe it would be better to just pay the rent directly to their landlord and/or even go as far as food "stamps"/cards etc... then you're forced to allocate a portion of benefits to paying for food rather than blowing it on everything else knowing the food bank safety net is there for that.