• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Upgrading to 6-cores... Worth for gaming?

Associate
Joined
27 Jun 2010
Posts
161
That pretty much say it, will going from 4-cores to 6-cores worth ? Will games need more than 4-cores anytime soon ? (2 or 3 years)
 
currently more games are being design to take advanage of 4core cpu's so at some point designer will take advanage of 6core cpu's. for now the only advanage i see in getting a 6core is that while you are gaming or can do few other task without having
 
there is no point at the mo til next gen as not every game uses multicore for gaming it would be a huge waste of money

This^.

You may as well save the money and wait for the next gen of games to come out that can run on 6 cores as standard. By then there will be much better hexacores that will grind the current 6-core cpu gen to the ground.
 
6 cores not really with the few exceptions atm BFBC2 & Dirt3.

But i would not be without a quad as a minimum because even if the 3 core theory happens now & then i would rather have a quad not maxed out then a 3 core which may be pinned at 100%.

Games that are based on the UT3 engine will use 4 cores.
Games that are based on the Capcom MT Framework engine will use 4 cores.
Games that are based on the later source engine will use 4 cores.

http://www.legionhardware.com/articles_pages/gaming_the_core_debate,2.html
 
This thread intrigues me as on a potential laptop purchase I have these 4 CPU options:

i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz 8mb Cache - £0 (comes as default in spec)
i7 960 Quad Core 3.2Ghz 8mb Cache - + £250
i7 970 Six Core 3.2Ghz 12mb Cache - + £272
i7 990X Six Core 3.46Ghz 12mb Cache - + £594

Now which of these would be any good for gaming, not just now but also at least top/high end for a year or 2 (preferably 2)?

Ive added prices for comparison, however my current basket does have the 990X in, so I have budget for that... so please go on comparable gaming performance between the 4, rather than saying desktop is cheaper or I wouldnt waste 600 quid on something that gives you 10% gains etc

:)
 
This thread intrigues me as on a potential laptop purchase I have these 4 CPU options:

i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz 8mb Cache - £0 (comes as default in spec)
i7 960 Quad Core 3.2Ghz 8mb Cache - + £250
i7 970 Six Core 3.2Ghz 12mb Cache - + £272
i7 990X Six Core 3.46Ghz 12mb Cache - + £594

Now which of these would be any good for gaming, not just now but also at least top/high end for a year or 2 (preferably 2)?

Ive added prices for comparison, however my current basket does have the 990X in, so I have budget for that... so please go on comparable gaming performance between the 4, rather than saying desktop is cheaper or I wouldnt waste 600 quid on something that gives you 10% gains etc

:)

Out of those, I think i'd go for the 970, and spend the money saved on something else, Ie a nice SSD if it hasnt already got one
 
Out of those, I think i'd go for the 970, and spend the money saved on something else, Ie a nice SSD if it hasnt already got one

Ok cheers; it has a 256Gb SSD as the main HDD, 2x580Ms SLI and 8GB RAM - so any money saved in reality goes back in my pocket.
 
Back
Top Bottom