Urban Exploration - Asylum!

Caporegime
Joined
8 Sep 2006
Posts
38,739
Location
On Ocuk
IMG_2919_20_21_22_23_24_25_tonemappedFB_zpsogqtyofa.jpg


IMG_2912_3_4_5_6_7_8_tonemappedFB_zpskpqa74pt.jpg


IMG_2891_2_3_4_5_6_7_tonemappedFB_zpsp8osaott.jpg


IMG_2884_85_86_87_88_89_90_tonemappedFB_zps3oghof2p.jpg


IMG_2877_78_79_80_81_82_83_tonemappedFB_zpslr60loih.jpg


IMG_2857_58_59_60_61_62_63_tonemappedFB_zpsepvymyxj.jpg


IMG_2847_48_49_50_51_52_53_tonemappedFB_zpsqy3n4uee.jpg
 
As per your other thread the chromatic aberration really stands out in these too.

What camera are you using? There's something that doesn't sit right with me in terms of processing. A lot look quite normal - if that makes sense - almost like estate agency photos.

I would personally try a shallower depth of field and with these I'd opt for a slightly desaturated look too, whereas it looks like you've upped it.

I like the model ones in terms of the idea but again a shallower depth of field would help. Not sure about the pen/veins on the legs though :p.
 
Having the 'actress' in there just makes it look like a cheap halloween outfit advert to me (I mean no offence, but it just looks tacky).

The non-person ones look grand though.
 
As per your other thread the chromatic aberration really stands out in these too.

What camera are you using? There's something that doesn't sit right with me in terms of processing. A lot look quite normal - if that makes sense - almost like estate agency photos.

I would personally try a shallower depth of field and with these I'd opt for a slightly desaturated look too, whereas it looks like you've upped it.

I like the model ones in terms of the idea but again a shallower depth of field would help. Not sure about the pen/veins on the legs though :p.

Isn't it because of the the HDR effect going on !!

The photos looks good, but over processed IMO.
 
Back
Top Bottom