Hi all,
In one of our remote offices I want to take a regular backup of the local Exchange server.
This backup will be to a hard disk location rather than a tape drive - as I cannot rely on the local users changing tapes for me.
The hard drive location would be on a separate local NAS device.
When launching the Windows backup software there seems to be the option of backing up to a network location, however there is a warning that only one backup would exist - so each backup would overwrite the previous one.
There is the option to backup to a "dedicated hard drive". Does anyone know that if I mapped a drive letter to the NAS from the Exchange Server if it would still treat that as a remote network location and still only allow me to have one backup existing?
If this is still the case, can anyone recommend some relatively cheap backup software that can cope with Exchange 2010. That can backup to a drive location rather than tape and would create multiple backup's over a period of time rather than simply overwriting the previous one each time?
Cheers.
In one of our remote offices I want to take a regular backup of the local Exchange server.
This backup will be to a hard disk location rather than a tape drive - as I cannot rely on the local users changing tapes for me.
The hard drive location would be on a separate local NAS device.
When launching the Windows backup software there seems to be the option of backing up to a network location, however there is a warning that only one backup would exist - so each backup would overwrite the previous one.
There is the option to backup to a "dedicated hard drive". Does anyone know that if I mapped a drive letter to the NAS from the Exchange Server if it would still treat that as a remote network location and still only allow me to have one backup existing?
If this is still the case, can anyone recommend some relatively cheap backup software that can cope with Exchange 2010. That can backup to a drive location rather than tape and would create multiple backup's over a period of time rather than simply overwriting the previous one each time?
Cheers.