• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Virtualisation

Soldato
Joined
4 Jan 2004
Posts
20,802
Location
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
How much difference will this make when running software like VirtualBox?

I'm using an e4300 right now, and tempted to get a q6600 and I was wondering if it really makes that much difference?
 
I've only been playing around with it a few days, it's awesome.

I can install stuff on a virtual machine, and if I don't like I can simply go back to an old hard disk image - very handy. :)

I may wait for the 45nm chips if they run virtualbox better. :)
 
Last edited:
I really want to go quad with my next upgrade, so I'll either go for a q660 or the 45nm equivalent...

A cooler chip would be nice, but I think a q6600 would be fine. I'm watercooling anyway, so I should be able to deal with the extra heat ok. :)
 
So wait, hang on... Will the new 45nm chip have better virtualisation than the current e6*** chips then? mdjmcnally said that the 45nm chips will be the same but just a bit cooler...

I want to get get a quad really, but if the 45nm chips are going to be better at virtualisation I may hold off the q6600 for now....

^ Probably not, USB stuff works better but then you still need drivers. XP is a good host tho.
 
Back
Top Bottom