Just to update my results:
I had a go at installing the 100.51 drivers using a modded .INF.
(edit: although I could have installed .54 without a modded inf I now see)
The results:
Lost Coast, 4xAA 16xAF: 55.76 This is wrong, see edit below, actual result: 86.76
No AA, Bilinear: 138.98
TMU, 4xAA, 16xAF, 52.7
No AA, Bilinear: 67
improvement all round on the results that I posted above. The most impressive improvement (though perhaps not the best, I haven't worked out the percentages..) in Lost Coast, no AA / AF, which is less than 1fps lower than the windows xp result (while I was a little disappointed in comparison with the AA / AF result). Both of the AA/AF results increased by exactly 7fps... interesting eh...
Can the people who say they have no drop in performance tell us what card / driver they are actually using, as we all know that the ATI drivers are currently much better than the nVidia ones..
I don't think anyone was really complaining Tute, just stating facts; performance is poor in comparison to XP for a lot of us.
Edit: I just ran the Lost coast 4xAA, 16xAF test again, with a restart of the game after enabling it. This time I got 86.03, which is much better, relatively. Unfortunately I'm apparently not very good at fair tests because I turned off real time spyware protection in windows defender between runs. I'll try again..
Final edit: Funny enough I turned it back on and got 86.76. Slightly higher.
my above post for reference:
I had a go at installing the 100.51 drivers using a modded .INF.
(edit: although I could have installed .54 without a modded inf I now see)
The results:
Lost Coast, 4xAA 16xAF: 55.76 This is wrong, see edit below, actual result: 86.76
No AA, Bilinear: 138.98
TMU, 4xAA, 16xAF, 52.7
No AA, Bilinear: 67
improvement all round on the results that I posted above. The most impressive improvement (though perhaps not the best, I haven't worked out the percentages..) in Lost Coast, no AA / AF, which is less than 1fps lower than the windows xp result (while I was a little disappointed in comparison with the AA / AF result). Both of the AA/AF results increased by exactly 7fps... interesting eh...
Can the people who say they have no drop in performance tell us what card / driver they are actually using, as we all know that the ATI drivers are currently much better than the nVidia ones..

I don't think anyone was really complaining Tute, just stating facts; performance is poor in comparison to XP for a lot of us.

Edit: I just ran the Lost coast 4xAA, 16xAF test again, with a restart of the game after enabling it. This time I got 86.03, which is much better, relatively. Unfortunately I'm apparently not very good at fair tests because I turned off real time spyware protection in windows defender between runs. I'll try again..
Final edit: Funny enough I turned it back on and got 86.76. Slightly higher.
my above post for reference:
Lost Coast:
all settings on 'high'
---XP
4xAA, 16xAF: 105.39
NO AA, Bilinear: 139.8
---Vista
4xAA, 16xAF: 48.76
NO AA, Bilinear: 97.46
TMU:
all on 'high', postprocess fx, lightmaps, force bloom ticked
---XP
4xAA, 16xAF: 60.1
NO AA, Bilinear: 81.1
---Vista
4xAA, 16xAF: 45.7
NO AA, Bilinear: 54.9
Last edited: