Want to get a record player. Advice please!

Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2013
Posts
8,607
My Dad has asked for a record player for christmas. We have a B&W zepplin to use as a speaker (I think we can use this?), but I know very little about what I need to get.

Total budget is around £200 I should think. Is this enough?

Complete novice at this so be nice :p:)

Thanks in advance.
 
Yes, you can use the Zeppelin. It has an input via a 3.5mm headphone jack. With the right kind of cable it will be possible to use that as an input. However, the sound coming direct from a turntable cartridge (the needle, if you will) is very low powered and sounds like it has no bass at all. A circuit is required to amplify and rebalance the sound. This is known variously as a phono stage (for when it is built in to another device such as a Hi-Fi amp) or phono pre-amp when the circuit is housed in its own box with a power supply as a stand-alone item. So, you need a turntable either with a built-in phono stage or an external phono pre-amp.

Bear in mind that vinyl has seen a resurgence of interest in the last few years, so there are a lot of manufacturers trying to cash in by producing cheap and not-so-cheap turntables. If it was me buying from scratch again with a £200 budget then I'd focus on the better known Hi-Fi brands and those brands that have maintained a presence in the market when vinyl was out of fashion. They're the ones more interested in performance rather than just making a quick profit. In the sub £200 market I'd look at Audio Technica, Denon and Pro-Ject.

Depending on what your dad used previously for listening to his albums then I'd use that as a guide to the sort of level (and budget) you should be aiming at with a new turntable.If it was a stack system then there are plenty of turntables under £200 with a built-in phono stage that would meet or exceed the performance of what he had. On the other hand, if your Dad was a bit more serious about music then he might have had something better from Garrard, Thorens, Dual, Rega, Revolver, Systemdeck, Ariston to name but a few that were hot picks through the 60's, 70's and 80's when LPs were the 'the thing'. If that's the case and he wants to rekindle the sort of quality of reproduction then your starting budget needs to be £300-£600, and that's still a drop in the ocean compared to the dizzy heights of top end gear.

Given that the Zeppelin is going to provide amplification, and the record collection is around 30 discs currently, then I think the Audio Technica LP60USB or Denon DP200USB would be appropriate choices. Each is available for under £140 and comes complete with a phono stage built-in so they'll be ready to go without much in the way of additional spending except for the stereo phono to 3.5mm jack lead that you'll use to hook up to the B&W. A side bonus is that each turntable also has a USB output. This means it is possible to transfer LPs to a laptop and make MP3 files.

Since both turntables are well under the £200 budget then I would strongly recommend the purchase of a good record cleaning brush too. A diamond stylus running over dust on a record groove embeds that dust in to the groove. Some of it gets stuck there forever. That's why LPs have a crackly sound. Keeping new vinyl clean means far quieter levels of dust noise. Removing dust from old records won't cure existing crackle, but it will help prevent the problem getting worse on each play. The type of brush I'd recommend is one with a velvet pad flanked by two rows of carbon fibre brushes. The one I have been using for 30+ years is made by Hunt EDA. A similar-looking design is available as the 'Milty Super Exstatic Carbon Fibre Record Cleaning Brush' for around £25, and the 'Analogue Studio Antistatic Record Cleaning Brush' at £16. It might also be a nice treat to buy a new album or two to christen the deck.
 
Thoughts on the project essential 2 in comparison to the 2 which you recommended above?

e: Although the elemental looks as though it would be the better bet as it had built in phono?
 
Last edited:
Essential 2 vs Denon and AT.... In everything that's important to music replay the Pro-Ject turntables are superior. The engineering all the way through is better which means that the Pro-Jects do a much better job of digging info out of the groove.

Essential 2 vs Elemental + phono pre-amp: That's not quite as straight forward because it does depend somewhat on the quality of the phono pre-amp. However, to make it simple if we said the difference in price between the two turntables is £50 then the question becomes easier. "Can I buy a better phono pre-amp for £50 than the one in the Essential 2?"... My gut feeling on that is no, you can't. Integrated electronics usually work out cheaper for the same performance because there isn't the retail margin that you would incur with a standalone product. Also, it's likely that Pro-Jects are buying better than you could at retail too. Their built-in phono stage is worth £100 if you had to buy an equivalent.

As for the rest of the TT, the main bearing will be the same I guess on both, but the arm will be better on the pricier deck. There might not be a lot in it if they went up against each other on a level playing field, but I would go with the Elemental 2 if budget allows.
 
Last edited:
I still think OP would be wasting the vinyl with a Zepplin . But I suppose if monies tight .....

Tend to agree and only 30 albums... It's a fad people think they want to get into or back into without realising what's involved, the costs and commitment required to make work. Stream from Spotify or Tidal would be cheaper and easier.
 
At a minimum at be looking at something like a amp with built in phono stage ... say Marantz 6004 or lower series that does the same thing ... or go rega amps , with the option of 2nd hand . Then pick up a nice budget £100 set of speakers .... and to hear anything worth while id got project debut Turntable but a better alternative a rega . The speakers can be taken out of the price if headphones is an option.

But at a basic "nice" listen its easily over £600 - £900 . But even at that price it will make the cd equivalent sound rubbish
 
I still think OP would be wasting the vinyl with a Zepplin . But I suppose if monies tight .....

Tend to agree and only 30 albums... It's a fad people think they want to get into or back into without realising what's involved, the costs and commitment required to make work. Stream from Spotify or Tidal would be cheaper and easier.
From a purist standpoint you're both right. However, if someone wants to indulge in a bit of nostalgia and they have the presence of mind to try to make the best purchase they can for their money rather than throwing cash at some piece of junk then really, who are we to question their motives? Let them be to make up their own mind.

At a minimum at be looking at something like a amp with built in phono stage ... say Marantz 6004 or lower series that does the same thing ... or go rega amps , with the option of 2nd hand . Then pick up a nice budget £100 set of speakers .... and to hear anything worth while id got project debut Turntable but a better alternative a rega . The speakers can be taken out of the price if headphones is an option.

But at a basic "nice" listen its easily over £600 - £900 . But even at that price it will make the cd equivalent sound rubbish
As for the issue about vinyl being wasted on the Zeppelin, or the idea that somehow vinyl only makes sense with a dedicated separates system, then forgive me for saying but I think that's a bit of an elitist attitude. Back in the day thousand upon thousands of stereo system buyers were perfectly happy listening to their vinyl on a stack system or music centre. Compared to a lot of them then today's Zeppelin is probably a better piece of gear for the reproduction of music than many of the stacks and midi's that sat in living rooms across the land when vinyl was in its heyday.

Sure, there's better gear. There always has been. If you really want to go crusading for quality then how about starting with the ubiquitous Bluetooth speaker which seems to be the current youth market's sum total of audio aspiration?

Who's to say that digging out the old record collection won't scratch some old itch to get back in to proper Hi-Fi or, if they never dipped a toe in before, to go at least to find out how good music can sound given half a chance. I think it's better to take enquiries such as this one and leave the door ajar in case they want to explore some more rather than slamming it closed because they're not spending enough.



Cleisthenes, going for a pure Hi-Fi-focussed turntable such as one of the Pro-Jects means foregoing a lot of the convenience features of the semi-automatic turntables such as the Denon and AT. Semi-automatic means things such as the turntable arm will cue itself from rest and move over to the disc and lower itself rather than you having to do this manually. It will also lift off and then park back in to the arm rest once the record has been played. Other convenience features are push button selection for the speed and the dust lid.

Apart from the simple on/off switch the Pro-Jects are completely manual so that no money is wasted on the mechanics to move the arm when it could be better spent elsewhere. The Elemental doesn't even come with a dust cover, but happily the Essential 2 does. Your Dad might place more emphasis on convenience rather than outright sound quality, or vice versa. You know him, we're just chucking ideas in to the pot. If you think he'd prefer the sound quality then go for the Essential 2. At current new LP prices the difference in cost is roughly equivalent to buying 5 albums, which isn't huge if you think he might like to expand his collection.

If you're curious about whether you'd hear the difference in sound quality then try a little experiment. Take a good CD and make an MP3 rip of a couple of tracks at 160kbps. Repeat this but make a FLAC rip instead. Personally for demo listening I use simple recordings that don't get too busy. Mary Chapin Carpenter Stones in the Road, Miles Davis Kind of Blue, David Grey White Ladder, Marc Cohn Marc Cohn; they've all got well recorded instruments and most have vocals too. They're good tools for sorting out the wheat from the chaff. You should be able to tell 160kbps from FLAC fairly easily. FLAC is lossless whereas 160k MP3 does change the character of the sound quite a bit. Next, try 192kbps MP3. This will be harder to distinguish but you should still be able to hear that the timing between the instruments is a bit off. If you can, then IMO buying the Pro-Ject deck isn't wasted on the Zeppelin. Good luck
 
Your opinion is very much appreciated :)

I know the difference between sound quality, as I use flac myself for everything. He however, I am not convinced will be able to distinguish the difference.

I will have a think, and if I have any further questions I will be sure to bring them to you.

It is almost entirely nostalgia from my dads POV. If it were me I would do things differently but the auto will be the best for him I feel
 
Not taken any offence from what you said Lucid and all valid points . I was brought up on an all-in-one system as a kid that my dad owned . And if all thast want is to play the vinyl the Zepplin is fine. My current TT set-up is just sat in a corner now for the odd headphone listen and is a lot less in cost/ quality than what I originally had. Was done due to money issues and space . But I can tell the difference in this set-up by a country mile to my other one.

As for the sound quality issue , no time to rip all my stud to hd .. i'm old school and actually use the disc lol . The digital files I do have are quite a few 192/24 and a few discs of blu ray super audio . Don't have direct comparisons for some of them but the ones are do , the difference is notable .

We all enjoy music in different ways :) And I agree the Bluetooth and lower bitrate music is annoying lol
 
Back
Top Bottom