4 May 2007 at 09:53 #1 jase555 jase555 Associate Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 743 Location up north ok want to image my current server on to another box to play around with patches and service packs, its server 2003 std will ghost do this and if so what version , looked at site and it did not mention server 2003 thanks jas
ok want to image my current server on to another box to play around with patches and service packs, its server 2003 std will ghost do this and if so what version , looked at site and it did not mention server 2003 thanks jas
4 May 2007 at 11:27 #2 sWiZzLe sWiZzLe Associate Joined 19 Oct 2002 Posts 1,940 Location Maidenhead Norton Ghost is evil, iys buggerred up a few of my drives in the past. I currently use Acronis True Image, its much faster and less buggy
Norton Ghost is evil, iys buggerred up a few of my drives in the past. I currently use Acronis True Image, its much faster and less buggy
4 May 2007 at 11:35 #3 Dingleberry88 Dingleberry88 Soldato Joined 26 Aug 2004 Posts 3,806 Location Manchester I've used Ghost loads without problems. It should work fine.
6 May 2007 at 12:00 #4 optimus optimus Associate Joined 24 Apr 2007 Posts 556 I'll second Acronis, its a far better package all round. And its user friendly...not like Ghost.
6 May 2007 at 13:29 #5 jbloggs jbloggs Soldato Joined 4 Sep 2005 Posts 6,803 Location UK Acronis True Image (by experience) is the best between it and Ghost.
6 May 2007 at 16:24 #6 doggo doggo Associate Joined 31 Dec 2006 Posts 1,071 Location Cardiff Acronis True Image would get my vote, I've tried that and Ghost and Ghost is pants. doggo
6 May 2007 at 16:36 #7 skanky skanky Associate Joined 21 Jul 2005 Posts 1,416 no problem with ghost here (though we use the corporate version at work), however i have no experience with the home versions.
no problem with ghost here (though we use the corporate version at work), however i have no experience with the home versions.