Waterblock design help

Soldato
Joined
27 Mar 2009
Posts
3,668
Was mulling over the idea of making myself a universal GPU block at work today and am trying to decide which design is best to go for. These are the water channels that will go over the core.

These are very early design ideas I've literally made in the last half an hour. These are all taken in the perspective of a cross section, so imagine the waterblock chopped in half and you are looking the same way the water will flow.

Design 1.

Conventional slots with 0.5mm between heat source and water channels.

345zmv8.png


I'm limited here with the depth is can go with the channels as its the only tooling I have available

surface area (in contact with water) 3640mm^2

Design 2.

Easier to machine but requires me to have more metal between the heat source and the water channels.

5p4oes.png


Surface area (in contact with water) 3166.8mm^2

Design 3.

Same as 2 but an extra row of holes. I'm not really limited how many rows I can put in (without being ridiculous) but have to keep the lump of metal at the bottom.

2zpjxxf.png


Surface are (in contact with water) 4750.2 mm^2

So what do you think? How much of a difference would I see with there being 2mm instead of 0.5mm between the heat source and the water channels? made of copper of course

Which design do you think would be least restrictive?

Like I said this would just something I started thinking about at work today and though i would ask for opinions.
 
The designs with the holes, are those 'tubes' that run from one edge of the block to the other? It looks like they could be quite restrictive.
 
Yeah they are "tubes". Thanks for your input.

Does anyone know how much of a difference having more solid metal between the heat source and the water will make?
 
Design 1 is how the original universal blocks were done. Fins or pins cut into the copper baseplate with water coming in, passing through them and then out again. Never heard of anybody doing anything like the second designs though and I would be worried about how restrictive they are. Modern universal blocks are a evolution of the cpu block with impingement designs and jet plates. The base plates are also very thin so I guess the transfer of heat to the water is quicker.
 
The most common design I've seen has multiple grooves cut in an 'X' shape across the block. This gives you diamond-shaped 'pins' that presumably improve flow whilst keeping the high metal->coolant contact area.

See the MIPS Iceforce block: http://i.imgur.com/3QujL.jpg
 
I'm thinking now if I went ahead and did it. I would do design 3 and 1 but 1 with a thick base like option 3 and compare results.
 
Back
Top Bottom