Website text spacing in dreamweaver vs browser

Soldato
Joined
16 Jan 2006
Posts
3,035
Hi.

I knocked up a website for my partner's business, learning as I went along, a couple of years ago.

It could do with being redone as although it looks (looked) fine online, the layout is a complete mess.

However, I checked it recently and although it still looks fine in ios, the text spacing is now wrong in Firefox and ie which is ruining the layout.

It was definitely fine at some point last year and it looks fine in live view and browser preview.

Any ideas what could have changed to break this?

Thanks a lot.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
16 Jan 2006
Posts
3,035
Thanks.

I'm not sure about the font but I've now realised that one of the pages is showing correctly still.

If duplicating its settings doesn't help I'll post the site.
 
Associate
Joined
3 Apr 2010
Posts
590
Thanks.

I'm not sure about the font but I've now realised that one of the pages is showing correctly still.

If duplicating its settings doesn't help I'll post the site.

My guess, without seeing the site or code, is the font is slightly different between osx/windows. Try a different font and see what happens.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
16 Jan 2006
Posts
3,035
Thanks very much.

I was looking last night but I've had so much to do I've not had time to sort it.

The busy time of the year is fast approaching and I'd really appreciate some help.

I know the site is a mess and needs png and layout optimisation but for the time being I just need the words to fit in their containers so everything looks right.

Can anyone tell me why the index page is fine but the text spacing is much larger in pages such as "about" and in the tables on the price list?

Www.afternoonteaques.co.uk

Thanks again.
 
Associate
Joined
19 Jan 2011
Posts
361
I realise your original problem is now fixed, but I strongly recommend that you replace your text images with a webfont. It would be just so much better on so many levels.

Google fonts has a few suitable candidates such as Pinyon Script and Parisienne which are free and easy to use.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
16 Jan 2006
Posts
3,035
I realise your original problem is now fixed, but I strongly recommend that you replace your text images with a webfont. It would be just so much better on so many levels.

Google fonts has a few suitable candidates such as Pinyon Script and Parisienne which are free and easy to use.

Can you give specifics on why it's so bad to have the text images?

She won't want to change it.

Thanks.
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Oct 2006
Posts
12,456
Location
Sufferlandria
The images are not computer-readable.
There's many reasons that this is a bad idea:
seo - search crawlers cant read it
accessibility - visually impaired visitors who need to use screen readers won't be able to navigate your site.

Also people who need to use high contrast colour settings or magnified fonts will have difficulty reading the text. (Saying that, i have 20:20 vision and i have difficulty reading it! )
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
16 Jan 2006
Posts
3,035
Thanks.

I though I'd done them in a way which meant they were still caught by seo and screen readers.

Yeah the text isn't the easiest to read but as long as she likes it my work is done :D
 
Associate
Joined
19 Jan 2011
Posts
361
touch is right on all counts, but there's also the matter of responsiveness – and not just in the 'works on a mobile' sense. For example, if you wanted to add another element to the navigation for example, with a webfont it would be simply a case of adding the element, whereas with images you need to recreate all your existing navigation items as well as your new one.
 
Back
Top Bottom