Went to Porsche today - Got lucky, superb experience.

OcUK Staff
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
Hi there


Arrived at Porsche at dinner time, was greeted by a lovely young lady and sat down in a waiting area where two customers quizzed me about the EVO X and how much they liked it and what I thought to it. They were waiting for something to be done with a 911, was surprised about 911 owners liking EVO's but Porsche themselves and the instructor also had a lot of respect for it, though mentioning GTR's seemed a bad word at Porsche which was met with silence, anyway moving on.

Sat down with salesman and he said what do I want and I told him how I'd got lucky to drive a friends 997 Turbo TIP earlier and loved it and that I *might* stretch to one used at the right money if they could source one around 50k with OPC warranty and to my surprise they said if I was happy with Cobalt blue they probably could do so as thats my favourite colour, but according to Porsche it was the least common colour. I said I wanted to check out a Cayman S gen2 and a 911 C2S.

Unfortunately they had no used Cayman S gen2 or a demo, they offered me a Boxster Spyder instead but I looked at it and said I want a roof so dismissed taking that out.

So they let me in the newest used Cayman S which was a 2009 manual with 290BHP, it had only done around 11,000 miles and felt very new. Driving this was very easy, infact the car was absolutely stunning to drive, it felt so pointy and very lively on its feet. The salesman took me around some excellent country twisty roads, roundabouts and dual carriage ways so I could really drive the car in all types of driving.

The steering on the Cayman S was razor sharp and I'd say medium ish weighted, I found the car superb and so so planted. The communication from the steering and all 4 wheels was immense and it really did make driving it a pleasure. The gearbox was simply gorgeous, changing gear and rev matching was a breeze. Performance wise the Cayman S needs revving, sub 4000rpm its quite flat but beyond 4000rpm you hear the engine come on cam and it pulls really well, infact when on the boil I was amazed by how quick this car was for a sub 300BHP car I've not driven anything faster. The Impreza I drove a few weeks back that had 330BHP would be left for dead by this Cayman S beyond 60mph as the acceleration once moving seemed very very strong, surprisingly good. Handling wise the car seemed perfect, I pushed the car a bit and really piled it into some roundabouts expecting it to push wide but nothing happened it just went where pointed with no fuss, the only issue was my body trying to fight the G-forces. The Cayman S seemed perfectly balanced no understeer or oversteer, I never found its limit so at the limit am unsure how they handle. But I was quite taken by the Cayman S it was easy to drive quick and it felt on rails and very much a drivers car full of communication.

The 911 C2S I got very lucky, a customer had booked driver truition with a Silverstone instructor but cancelled so the sales guy asked if I'd like to go on the driver tuition drive with the instructor in the 911 C2S, off course I said yes. Had a good chat with the instructor regarding previous cars, trackdays etc at which point he said excellent, someone who knows about cars and buys them to drive them, not pose in them. He gave me the keys and said I probably know where the better roads are so left me to drive where I wanted, so I took the country roads between Wilmslow and Macclesfield and back on some dual carriage ways with many roundabouts to play with. This was a 2006 911 C2S with Porsche exhaust. The first thing I noticed is the 911 feels larger car but still shrinks around you and sub 4000rpm the 911 had a lot more grunt without a doubt. Accelerating hard though the 911 C2S did not seem really any quicker than the Cayman S, power wise top end they felt similar, it was the 911's torque at lower speeds which was very noticable and out of corners in higher gears when not on the boil.

Steering wise the C2S had the lightest steering, still loads of feel and very sharp, but attacking narrow bumpy roads what I did notice is how the 911's front end got light/floaty, even sometimes skipping across bumps. The instructor said all RWD 911's do this and the tactic is to not fight it just be relaxed and go with it as the front end will never move much, they move around and its something you just get used too. At no point though in this 911 did I ever feel it was gonna kill it me, the rear-end always felt glued down, even when booting it in 1st off the mark and out of corners in 2nd gear, infact the instructor said I am impressed that an EVO driver is driving a Porsche so well and is not treating the inputs like a hammer such as most EVO drivers do, haha.

The winning point for me of the C2S was the noise, at 6500rpm the note from the cabin/exhaust was simply amazing, truly WOW. There was a long sweeper and the instructor said apply power at the start and don't let off and you will see the 911's party piece, the backend just gripped the tarmec and catapulted out the end at crazy speed with no issues, the rear was so planted. The gearbox on this was not as good as the Caymans but that could be the fact this car was 3-4yr older as well. In comparison between the 911 and Cayman S I'd say the Cayman S felt more go-kart like and actually felt like a better chassis and certainly better in tighter corners and once moving the fact it only had 290BHP seemed not to be an issue, it was certainly noticably quicker than the 330BHP STI I drove by some distance. The 911 though did have more grunt low down and up top I'd say it would slightly edge the Cayman S but not by much, the 911's party piece of acceleration of the mark in 1st gear, it just nails it down and goes, thats engine in the boot for you. The main concern was front-end lightness and it skipping over bumps and I think because of that the car does require a different driving style as the driver needs to drive the car to dial out that understeer.

Both the Cayman S and 911 C2S had the gorgeous turbo wheels fitted and both were Basalt black, looked stunning clean. The 911 had better looks, sound, grunt low down and better of the mark with handling that felt great especially when on the power out of corners with delightful steering. I'd say the Cayman S had slightly better weighted steering and felt more tighter in tight turns and roundabouts and its front-end never skipped over bumps and it never pushed wide and its rear-end never budged, but it had less grunt, did not sound as a good but seemed practically as fast once on cam (above 4000rpm) with a better gearbox. Plus the sound on cam was addictive so with a Porsche exhaust might be very nice.
The instructor did assure me new 911s are not like ones of old, if you hit brakes mid corner or have to adjust line they won't bite you like old ones would, but he did say driving a 911 too its true ability and well is a smooth affair.


I also got lucky to meet up with a friend who owns a 997 Turbo Tiptronic and he gave me the keys. Now some of the Porsche purist may find this surprising but I felt the turbo had the better steering feel and out of all three cars it had the heaviest steering which I liked, maybe this is the diffs in the front? However the car never once felt like it was AWD infact it always felt RWD and my god that bose sound system is bloody amazing.

I found the power delivery and performance mind blowing and its certainly more shove in your seat and far quicker than the EVO everywhere in the rev range. The only good thing about the tiptronic for me was traffic light grandprix, all I had to do was stomp the loud pedal and what felt like 2s we were doing 60mph, it was mind blowing off the mark and so easy. Booting it at 50mph and again what felt like 3s had you in license loosing territory and it felt damn quick too with the turbos pushing you back in the seat. Though out of all three cars the turbo sounded the tamest, very quiet in the cabin, infact too quiet for a car of this genre.

Now the 911 turbo is the only one I felt that rear-end move, I purposely found a corner that was wet and eased in the power and purposely got on the power a bit too early to see how the rear moved and as expected it stepped out and a quick flick of the steering it was all in line with no drama but a lot of fun, did I correct it or did the computer, who knows but it was fun and felt safe. On bumpy twisty roads the turbo did not seem to float/bounce on the front-end like the C2S did, infact the Turbo's front end felt more planted, I am not putting this down to the 4WD but to the extra weight of the turbo and more weight over the nose.

I've driven 3 cars, all with turbo wheels and feel for me out of the Porsche fleet its gonna either be a Cayman S gen2 PDK or a 997 Turbo manual. I am possibly dismissing the 911 C2S because I felt it did not feel particulary quicker than the gen1 Cayman S once moving and the floaty front-end was a little off-putting. I am not dismissing the 911 C2S and may arrange a test drive in another one before I dismiss them or even try the C4S.

Before I forget the brakes on all three were fantastic and so so feelsome, they were very un-assisted and felt great, at first they felt weak but because they are not over-assisted you do have to push quite hard at which point they are very strong.

I am looking forward to getting an extended test drive in the Cayman S PDK as with 320BHP and PDK transmission I think that will have the grunt/performance to beat a 911 C2S once moving and if anything it will only handle better been a newer car, but the Cayman S was an epic joy to drive.

If I can find a 911 turbo for the right money it will be my favourite choice, its got the looks, immense performance, traction and feels so damn quick so I'd not bore of a lack of vroom vroom and if I did the turbo is hugely tunable relatively easily. Porsche did confirm any turbo they supplied even if old would have 2yr OPC warranty which would cover engine, box, differentials, basically anything expensive that breaks as they did mention engines popping/breaking are 10k plus bills so that warranty is a must.

So if I can stretch it right now I am wanting a 997 Turbo manual in cobalt blue as its got the power and looks, the only area it might be a bit weak is real bumpy and twisty b-roads which would mean driving it kind of just how I drove the Mustang and learn how to drive it properly.

Though I am very interested to see how a gen2 Cayman S with PDK drives, with the PDK and extra power it could just tip me in its favour. :)


Tomorrow I am off to Middlehurst to test drive an R35 GTR and then next weekend an BMW M3. :D
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
if you can stretch to a 997 turbo i don't think you'll be disappointed. Tough choice between an E92 M3 and an R35 GTR.

M3 has that v8 exhaust note, comparatively modest running costs (against the GTR and 911 Turbo) but then not as fast.

Oh to be in your position :)

Running cost wise from what Porsche showed me a 911 and Cayman S is quite a but cheaper than the M3 on servicing. And the turbo is just a little more expensive. :)

GTR however via Nissan is very expensive, but Litchfields can service the GTR as well which makes it no more expensive either and due to new laws Nissan still have to honor warranty. :)

I am driving the M3 DCT as I don't want to dismiss it, but my god its going to have to be amazing after driving these Porsches and from what I remember of the GTR. As like you say the M3 does not have the power of the Porsches/GTR or the grip.

But yes M3 with exhaut makes the best noise without a doubt and is also the cheapest to buy used with DCT's going from 35k. :)


I was very impressed with Porsche service though, they were never pushy and happy to let me pick and drive anything along with answering all questions and I was impressed to see them filling up with Vpower too. :)

Question is does Porsche Wilmslow have good after service too?
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
997 Turbo.

Agreed I want it for looks, power, the class and the fact its a 911, plus its grown up.

My one and only fear is will it be a handful cross country or should I say slower than what the EVO or a GTR would be, I know cars aint all about pace as its also about the fun too, but I do love grabbing the EVO by scruff of its neck at times and just chucking it about, now the Cayman S felt like one could do the same, but maybe in a 911 it would become angry and kill me?

What the instructor did say if I do buy a car and to keep it hush but request they throw a free driving day in at my choice of track to safely learn how to control the car on its limits and one an icepad. :)
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
Seeing as though you are financing half of it... stop being such a wuss!

http://pistonheads.com/sales/2341945.htm

Dont do that, its confusing enough choosing between these cars without another one thrown in, did not realise new GT3 had gone sub 60k. :eek:

Question is I am wary of a 911 Turbo / C2S, is the GT3 maybe not a bit too hardcore/purist for my first 911 as surely out of all the 911's the GT3 is the one most likely to bite and hard?
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
I must say, the Cayman is the only Porsche I genuinely like the looks of

In pictures I think it looks rather pap, but in the flesh I was like thats nice with stunning lines, though I do preferre the 911.

One thing I did notice driving these Porsches is you feel like Brad Pitt, haha, the amount of stunning women all of a sudden checking you out because you drive a Porsche. :)
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
Housey will answer that in depth no doubt. I've only got extended passenger experience so whatever I say means squat. But I was in one being driven very very hard and at no point did I feel that the car was going to come off the road and end up in a ditch. The levels of grip are phenomenal. The car was running on Pilot Sport 2s.

Seriously. For this amount of money, don't dismiss it.

And you're a driver, not a poser.. don't worry about it being hardcore. It'll come with some luxuries and a nice stiff suspension :p

Yeah all three of these Porsches I drove all had Michelin PS2's fitted, seems a favourite tyre on Porsches but the PS2 is an epic tyre.

I don't want to spend much over 50k (max) really so pushing another 10k on top even though I can afford starts to get uncomfortable in regards to finance.

As daft as it sounds the 911's had more of a Mustang feel to them, get sight of the apex and apply more power as your unwinding the steering and feel the rear-end squat. Wheras the Cayman S in comparison seemed more nimble and chuckable like an EVO but with all the involvment and feedback of a Porsche. :)

I feel a Cayman S gen2 PDK I might really like all it will lack is the turbos performance but if anything be quicker on twisty stuff and easier to drive as such, though at the same time the 911 did feel bloody awsome when powering out of corners but I liked the Cayman for its quick in approach and the fact it had no understeer. Though the Turbo did feel less understeery than the C2S and the power addictive and more power comes just by adding packets of crisp in the footwell. :D
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
ultimately i can't contribute much to this conversation as i'll be lucky to drive one of the cars mentioned above, let alone own one.

But i'd be deciding between the 997.1 Turbo or the E92 M3.

Right now I feel I'd actually take any of the Porsches over the M3, but next weekend I may have a different oppinion. I just can't see the M3 been anywhere near as sharp as the Cayman S but lets wait and see. :)
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
Adding more power is just an attempt to mask the effects of weight, but when you come to a corner you can feel the weight. Lighter cars are much more nimble in the bends.

Being light has nothing to do with luxury, most of the weight is due to "safety" features that are mandated - many of which have little influence on actual occupant safety.

Cant agree there, the EVO X is heavier than previous EVO's but if anything its handling is a vast improvement yet its heavier.

The EVO X is 150kg heavier than previous EVO and even more so heavier than models before but the weigh it handles is truly immense and much better than previous versions.

Cars might have got heavier but suspension technology/dynamics have improved vastly.

Also a GTR feels very nimble mid corner and it proves this on track too its vastly quicker than many lighter cars with similar power.


Yes if you could make a GTR 1500kg, it would be even better, but in this modern world it weighs 1700kg unfortunately but so what it an epic car and it out handles many cars which weigh less than it.
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
Downforce does not add inertia, weight does.

Try again beermonster.

Its not just weight though is it, weight is just one thing, downforce, suspension dynamics, powertrain, differentials, advanced computers all effect how a car handles.

When cornering at high speed downforce is very important, inertia can be dealt with by adding more mechanical grip via a larger contact patch and more downforce.

A car been lighter does not necessarily mean its better.

What is your argument exactly?

Are you say lighter cars handle better than heavier cars? If so thats rubbish.

If your saying making an already great car lighter will make it better, then yes that is correct but generally making same car lighter will generally mean they are poverty spec or stupidly expensive.

The Cayman is what 1350kg and don't get me wrong its bloody amazing, but I'd bet that a GTR weighing some 350kg more will corner just as fast as it no problem. Which proves its not all about weight.
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
I'm making the point that if you take two cars, both having the "ultimate setup" [god that sounds like something off one of the Jap CAr shows - ultimate setup!] for that weight or whatever then if one of them is lighter (provided it has enough downforce for its needs) it will be better.

I am not saying all lighter cars are better, I am saying that ALL ELSE being equal (and by equal I do not mean exactly the same setup, I mean the same level of setup) the lighter car will be better.

Yeah but that rarely happens in the real world, the best case was the M3 CSL, it destroyed the regular M3 and it was something 110-140kg lighter, but at the same time they made other improvements to the car as well which all added to a great package.

Another prime example is a Lotus Elise they are mega light, but don't necessarily corner any faster than say the much heavier M3 CSL or other heavier cars.

Weight is just one of the many factors that contribute to a cars handling, look at an old Ford Capri's, very light, but shockingly poor in corners until you re-vamp the suspension. Making a car corner/handle consist of many many things, weight it just one of them. A car been light in weight in helps but by getting everything right a heavy car can also handle superbly and the GTR is a prime example of this.
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
rypt I agree with you. Light weight is important. Most heavy cars would struggle round mountain hairpins. However it is less important as corner speed increases.

Thats what I liked about the Cayman steering it around little islands or very tight corners it just seemed hooked up. The 911 did not feel quite as tight in comparison and lighter on the front-end.

How a GTR would compare unknown, its been a while since I drove one but I do remember it seeming to defy the laws of physics as it just seemed fast at everything.
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
[TW]Fox;18607951 said:
What a fantastic list of cars to choose from. You are at the stage where every car on the shortlist is a 5 star, grade A performance car. None of them are anything less than excellent. Which is the best car for you cannot be decided or even argued based on figures and paper alone, it purely comes down to how you feel behind the wheel.

I can't relate to your position I'm afraid so it would be fundamentally pointless for me to say 'omg get the M3', instead I'll just say I envy you and I bet it'll be a hell of a lot of fun finding out which car wins.


Your literally spot on here Fox, I want them all because they all are 5 star cars like you say and because of that trying to pick one is going to be very difficult as they are all amazing cars. :)
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
[ui]ICEMAN;18608033 said:
Having owned a Cayman S, 997.1 C2S, 997.2 C4S and a now an M3 I have feelings about all of the above.

Make no mistake, the Cayman is an incredible handling car but its weight is not why it feels nimble, it's purely the configuration of the car compared with the 911. If you drive a GT2RS or GT3RS you'll understand completely what I'm talking about, they still feel significantly different (although a lot better than the regular C2) than the Cayman does. Your salesman was right, you just need to trust that the 911 can do its thing, the 4WD "woolies" up the handling and makes it feel less likely to push on the front but in fact the opposite is true when you're really on it, there is a reason the GT cars run RWD not 4. If you're really unhappy with the lightness of the front end you can adjust the suspension too. I just fear that if you've been given the choice, knowing you as I do that if you go the Cayman route you'll be wishing you'd bought the 911. There is a reason the 911 costs more than the Cayman and holds higher status within the brand.

If you're looking point to point, cross country, the 997TT and the GTR will be hard to beat, again you've just got to believe that the TT will sort it all out for you and it does. It's more "exciting" than the GTR in the sense that it lets you get a bit wild but it really is perfectly stable and would be a good matchup against the GTR.

I don't know how it'll be in the UK but over here I took a massive loss on my Cayman, it didn't hold its vaue well at all but if you're not buying new, it's probably not such a huge issue. The 911's hold their value significantly better but then we are due a new one at the end of the year which is part of the reason I stayed away for the moment and will re-evaluate at the end of a couple of years of the 991.

For what it's worth, as you know I just bought my M3 and chopped in my 997. Its been a week now and the dust has settled; I can honestly hand on heart say I made an excellent decision. The e92 M3 is an excellent car and I see why the press raves about them. I wanted to dislike it, I really did and that's exactly how I went into my test drive but the proof is sitting in my garage that clearly it wasn't what I expected. I love the noise, the engine feels hugely strong, it's a lovely place to be and I had chance to put it up against an R8, 997.1 C2S, 997.2 C4S and a Z06 today. The only one it lost to was the Z06 and was pretty much neck and neck with the C4S.2 (I'm sure a 2S would have had it). Basically I don't regret my choice; the M3 will never be a 911 but then its not pretending to be either, it's a fantastic car in its own right and will definitely put a smile on your face like any of the cars in your lineup.

My decision was influenced away from the GTR due to our very high running costs over here, else that would have been a serious contender but you're faced with an interesting choice. Personally while the 997TT is a great car, it is getting on a bit now and with the new car looming, I'd be waiting to see if the .2 PDK ones drop sufficiently before snatching one up since the difference is night and day. I owned my 911 for almost 3 years and thoroughly enjoyed it but as they say, "variety is the spice of life" :).


Id suspect the M3 to be quicker than the R8 for sure and like you say think between the new 911's it will be very close as you found out only the Z06 really is the super-quick one in that bunch, afterall it is the lightest and most powerful. :)

Well I've given it some thought tonight and am gonna have another go in a 997 but gonna make it a 997.2 C2S with 385BHP and see how I find that before I make a decision.

Right now firm favourite is the Turbo, my thinking is if I buy one right, get a damn good deal I think they have hit pretty much the bottom of their depreciation as they simply can't get cheaper than the older 996 Turbos as X50's and S models are still fetching above 40k, so if I can bag a decent 997 with relatively low miles at the right price it should hold value well.

I think your right a newer Cayman will loose more money as would a newer 911, an older 911 though probably not be too bad.

The GTR is an unknown at moment, some say buy a low miles 09/59 car for 40k and it will still be worth 35k or so in 2yr wheras others say because the 2011 is much better and will be used examples in the near future it may impact the older cars more meaning maybe an 09 car in 2 years could be selling for 30k.

I shall drive another 911 and make it the 997.2 to just see how a newer 911 with more power feels. I shall also report back after Ive driven the M3 and Id be interested in knowing what the tuning options are on the M3 as well. :)
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
Speak to me before you do and I'll run through the various setup options with you which may not be obvious on the day (and let's face it dealer staff often don't know!). There are various suspension, steering and throttle options available and some are only available under certain circumstances.

Can you email me your number mate as think have lost it.
[email protected]
 
OcUK Staff
OP
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
38,233
Location
OcUK HQ
Hi Gibbo,

Have you driven a C4S?

Thanks for the post, they always make for interesting reading.

HEADRAT

No mate.

Slower once moving and the C2S has more than enough grip.

So unelss the 4S helps stop the bobbing or dial out understeer I can see me liking it less, you think the 4S would do that, or would putting a bag of sound in the front of the C2S have the same effect, lol.
 
Back
Top Bottom