We're No 1

[Sammael]

Originally posted by TheBeansprout
Yup, especially when Sammael gets his fleet online

Hehe, yeh sorry about the delay chaps and chapesses, I've been a busy wee bee recently, but STILL hoping to get it rolled out on 60ish machines in the next couple of weeks.

 

[Garp]

We lost the top spot according to BOINCstats.com

http://www.boincstats.com/stats/boinc_team_stats.php?pr=bo&st=0&to=100#2

edit: according to Boincstats we've never been ahead of them

 

[Sammael]

Originally posted by Garp
We lost the top spot according to BOINCstats.com

http://www.boincstats.com/stats/boinc_team_stats.php?pr=bo&st=0&to=100#2

edit: according to Boincstats we've never been ahead of them

Sorry but that says we are over 2 MILLION behind. How can that happen overnight??

 

[MDPlatts]

Originally posted by Sammael
Sorry but that says we are over 2 MILLION behind. How can that happen overnight??

Because thats the OVERALL BOINC total - not S@H - Doh!

This is the one you want :- http://www.boincstats.com/stats/team_stats.php?pr=sah&st=0&to=100

 

[MDPlatts]

From the DG chart, both teams are well down on credits assigned today - probably the validators falling behind again - not sure if the value on the status page is meant to be accurate again (I know they turned it off a while back - but its non-zero again, so whilst its out of date, its meant to be representative) - but if it is its worrying.

Also SG continue to get more active crunchers growing whilst we are slightly up on a month ago - but only by 10-20 - they are up almost 100.

M.

 

[Mattus]

--- - 2005-01-22 16:55:47 - Insufficient work; requesting more
SETI@home - 2005-01-22 16:55:47 - Requesting 1382400 seconds of work
SETI@home - 2005-01-22 16:55:47 - Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi
SETI@home - 2005-01-22 16:55:50 - Scheduler RPC to http://setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded
SETI@home - 2005-01-22 16:55:50 - Message from server: No work available
SETI@home - 2005-01-22 16:55:50 - No work from project
SETI@home - 2005-01-22 16:55:50 - Deferring communication with project for 1 hours, 0 minutes, and 0 seconds

 

[VeNT]

omfg, boincs out of work!
NOOOOOO
IDLE CRUCHERS, DANGER DANGER!

 

[Mad old tory]

Yeah my total has only gone up about 75 cobblestones from last night, i think the validator is being screwy again. Haven't had any problems conacting the schedular though

 

[RogueTLDW]

Originally posted by Matt Wood
--- - 2005-01-22 16:55:47 - Insufficient work; requesting more
SETI@home - 2005-01-22 16:55:47 - Requesting 1382400 seconds of work
SETI@home - 2005-01-22 16:55:47 - Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi
SETI@home - 2005-01-22 16:55:50 - Scheduler RPC to http://setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded
SETI@home - 2005-01-22 16:55:50 - Message from server: No work available
SETI@home - 2005-01-22 16:55:50 - No work from project
SETI@home - 2005-01-22 16:55:50 - Deferring communication with project for 1 hours, 0 minutes, and 0 seconds

Just updated 5 of my crunchers - 1st one got the same message as above - next 4 where fine and recieved work - re-ran the update on the 1st and its sorted ...there is work there just the scheduler must be under a bit of pressure i guess

 

[MGP]

This isn't good, I'm seeing seti reporting no work availabel messages too. That's on the couple of PCs I have running the GUI. Who knows what the borged ones are doing

Meanswhile their RAC is now higher than ours according to the Deutshebeat charts. It'll only be a day or at most two, and we'll slip back down into second again. That's going to leave a lot of egg on face.

 

[MDPlatts]

had quite a few here too - also the DB chart it showing both teams having only recieved 60-odd K credits today where we should really be getting 100K or so more than that (i.e. our RAC) - so we're both 100K down today. When credit starts to flow again we can only hope to repeat past successes and get the early credits first - since the gap is <9K we could temporarliy go behind if they get there first!

M.

 

[MDPlatts]

The DB chart is now showing our RAC as LOWER than that of SG - panic panic panic!!! - though S@H's top teams page still shows us with an RAC 5K higher

 

[dunc]

I think perhaps Mudnapers stats have gone a little AWOL perhaps. I have checked a bunch of other stats sites and we do appear to be in the lead still for bost TC and RAC.

Not by much though

Dunc

 

[RobOC]

Looks like the validation queue is rising again (90k at the time of writing). I hope they don't just dump the outstanding credit again this time like they seemed to do last time.. the way it just disappeared was quite suspect before..

 

[MGP]

Originally posted by RobOC
Looks like the validation queue is rising again (90k at the time of writing). I hope they don't just dump the outstanding credit again this time like they seemed to do last time.. the way it just disappeared was quite suspect before..

At least we've gained a slight cushion over the last couple of days that might cover us for any anomolies in the validator.

Borkley clearly have an issue to deal with. If the validator cannot cope with the current level of traffic there's no way they can finally ditch classic.

 

[MGP]

 

[RobOC]

Its really bugging me cos I've submitted 90 or so cobblestones over the last 6 or so days and I appear not to have been credited for any of em yet. I really want to get sub 100!! I've been stuck where I am for weeks now because of all these problems.

Also, my machine seems to have duplicated itself in the stats recently when I changed my local IP and it doesn't seem to want to let me merge them on the seti site. Anyone know why?

 

[MGP]

Originally posted by RobOC
Also, my machine seems to have duplicated itself in the stats recently when I changed my local IP and it doesn't seem to want to let me merge them on the seti site. Anyone know why?

The merge thing is a big issue. Recent changes in the boinc beta clients form 4.13 upwards have been indentifing the same PCs differenly, yet they cannot be merged. I'd imagine your changed IP has had a similar effect. Its a borkley thing. Live with it

 

[RobOC]

Ahhh now that you mention it, I did go to 4.14 and back to 4.13, so thats probably what did it. The fact that my IP is different on each "machine" must just be coincidence. Annoying though. They're the same fliping machine but the processor seems to have been identified differently...

http://www.setisynergy.com/stats/boinc-stats.php?id=7810291

 

[Berserker]

It's still somewhat close: http://www.teamocuk.com/steamc.php?p=SAH&t=30189



Must get more firepower.