debatable.32 inch is just too big for 1440p
I know that, 93 ppi on a 32 inch and 109 ppi on a 27 inch, 93 ppi is fine on a 24 inch 1080p but not on a 32-inch 2k panel, they are not comparable like that. The text isn't as clear as it is on a 27-inch panel, I have been through 7x Acer predator xb271hu's, 9xSamsung C27HG70's (amazon kept sending me repacked/used panels), 2x AORUS AD27QD's and 1x Benq EX3203R, the 32 inch was just too big, the text wasn't clear and you could actually notice the pixels. 32 inch is perfect for 4k but too big for 2kdebatable.
32" 1440p has the same ppi as 24" 1080p.
using 2x 32" 1440p monitors side by side as we speakthe 32 inch was just too big, the text wasn't clear and you could actually notice the pixels. 32 inch is perfect for 4k but too big for 2k
That's fine you're entitled to your own opinion, but I'm sure many will agree with what I'm saying, in fact, many reviews state as such. I personally have preorded the new LG 27GL850-B Nano cell which I hope to have by the end of next week, I already own a 49 inch LG SK8100PLA (moved down from 55 inch as better 49 inch is the ppi sweet spot for a tv imo)nano cell and love the image it produces, hopefully the monitor satisfies me the same.using 2x 32" 1440p monitors side by side as we speaki personally don't agree with your description of events, but monitor size/resolution is all based on personal preference.
so as such, one person's treasure is another person's junk and vice versa.
tl;dr - YMMV.
as much entitled to your own opinion, of courseThat's fine you're entitled to your own opinion, but I'm sure many will agree with what I'm saying,
so as such, one person's treasure is another person's junk and vice versa.
sureas much entitled to your own opinion, of courseas I'm sure many will agree with what I'm saying too.
just search the AOC Q3279 thread and you'll see many satisfied users.![]()