What are your thoughts?

DominicStar said:
How come everytime we have a thread like this we get a load of abusive terms for women who happen to like sex the same as men? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Because it's commonly accepted that very nearly ALL men will **** anything they can get their paws on, and not all women will. Hence, we require a word to separate the two types of women, whereas ALL men are ****s.

So there, you raving feminist lesbian sympathiser
 
Jenjey said:
If you meet a guy/girl in a club and there's good conversation, you get on well and think you could get a few dates out of it....is it bad to decline an invite back to their place?
Click to expand...

No, not at all.

I'm guessing i'm in the minority (care? no) but I wouldn't be keen on going back to a girls place the first time i'd met her, not sure if that makes me old fashioned or just a bit of a gayer:p
 
likwid said:
It's also possible that she was waiting for you to make a move. When you didn't and asked about it days later she simply acted as any nice girl would do in such a situation by acting innocent and denying it. :)
Click to expand...

This is a wise answer. Believe it or not, it's better to be selfish on matters of a sexual nature, go get what you want. She wants it too - but would never say so!
 
casnual.jpg
 
There's a risk of something bad happening to you if you leave your house.

NEVER leave your house people.
 
Jenjey said:
Yes, great answer darling! Just gotta lol at rumpy pumpy.....and I think it is in fact you that wishes these scenarios!! :p


With regards to the STD debate that is going on.... most girls don't like condoms, but a bit of latex irritation is so much more preferable to the disgusting discharge of the most prevalent STD's that I have been unfortunate enough to have to examine on some patients! Be safe!!!
Click to expand...

Hello stranger!

And just wheeere have you been? :p
 
I wouldn't say it's bad per se, as long as you make it clear you are interested (exchange digits and talk about meeting up again).

Of course things can still progress to a relationship from a 'one night' stand. One of my friends said to me she never really goes on dates, if she likes someone she just gets intimate and then continues from there. Another friend of mine just seems to meet girls in clubs and then sometimes dates them for a few months afterwards.

For some people initiating the whole 'dating' thing is quite scary, this probably sounds kinda strange to some people but my first ever date was actually years after my first relationship. I couldn't bring myself to ask girls out but if they made the first move then I would be quite comfortable in that situation.
 
i have a mate who had a threesome with a girl and one of his mates on a first "date" (not really sure you can call it that :D). he then went out with this girl for quite a few months afterwards. :p
 
marc2003 said:
i have a mate who had a threesome with a girl and one of his mates on a first "date" (not really sure you can call it that :D). he then went out with this girl for quite a few months afterwards. :p
Click to expand...

i bet he had a lot of fun to, the risk of catching an STD with someone like that is probably huge though , no pasty munching etc maybe im wierd but i like a nice greggs pasty to munch on before the real action starts so ill stick with my wife who i know isnt the type of woman who would ever cheat.
 
likwid said:
If you knew a sexual partner was hiv positive would you be happy with 99% effective protection?

Can you comprehend that 99% means that 1 in a 100 of all people who had casual sex last night while wearing a condom were not protected from sexually transmitted diseases?
Click to expand...

actually 99% means that if you do get an STD you cant sue for them claiming 100%. It doesn't mean 1 in 100 people it doesn't work for. It's far more reliable then that, they just can't claim its perfect.
 
8igdave said:
actually 99% means that if you do get an STD you cant sue for them claiming 100%. It doesn't mean 1 in 100 people it doesn't work for. It's far more reliable then that, they just can't claim its perfect.
Click to expand...
didnt they used to claim 99.8% or some bs number like the bleach sprays kill 99.9% of germs
 
arknor said:
didnt they used to claim 99.8% or some bs number like the bleach sprays kill 99.9% of germs
Click to expand...

its probably like 99.999242344873248% but they say 99% because quite frankly only the most anal (no pun intended) care.

:EDIT:

Also im very tired but i beleive if you ignore the whole splitting issue wearing two condoms takes the protection from 99% to 99.99% not 198% as was suggested rather jokingly but i am very tired so ya know so my maths may be off. Infact running it through my head i probably did do that wrong as i took 99% + 1% x 99% but that is not the only combination that protects you. Meh i cba to work it out fully.
 
Last edited:
as pretty much just covered: it's only 99% because it's rounded down and because it covers them for any liability. I think they state it's something like 99.8% effective, and in truth it's probably 99.9% effective but they don't say that because the percentage 99.9 LOOKS a bit like the emergency telephone number.

B@
 
I suspect you need to grow up. For the record I'm a 37 year old straight male in a long term relationship. Quite why you're criticising me when I'm trying to put some common sense into a serious conversation I guess is down to your own immaturity or drunkenness.

As for the 99.8%, where's the source?

If you're telling people they can stick it in anyone as long as they wear a condom then the responsible thing would be to know what you're talking about and to provide a reliable source. What big dave thinks when he is drunk doesn't cut it and seriously you should keep it to yourself. I just quickly searched and found numbers ranging from 85% to 97%.
 
8igdave said:
its probably like 99.999242344873248% but they say 99% because quite frankly only the most anal (no pun intended) care.

:EDIT:

Also im very tired but i beleive if you ignore the whole splitting issue wearing two condoms takes the protection from 99% to 99.99% not 198% as was suggested rather jokingly but i am very tired so ya know so my maths may be off. Infact running it through my head i probably did do that wrong as i took 99% + 1% x 99% but that is not the only combination that protects you. Meh i cba to work it out fully.
Click to expand...

You talk some crap. Two condoms will most definitely split because the rubber pulling against eachother will cause them to.

Seems like big dave is just out of sex education too, or evidently not it may seem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom