Ok i am behind on whats hot and whats not so need your help.
Im doing an upgrade from pc in sig and getting a intel setup. Now the core2duo's were very popular when they came out and everyone was raving on about them. Now i see the quads are out and the Q6600 is very popular.
So the questions...
1) Which Q6600 is everyone raving on about the energy efficiant one or the normal one? Whats the difference?
2) Whats the better chip to buy at the moment prices between £150-£200?
3) Seen as most things dont use 2 processors let alone 4 wouldnt i be better of buying a faster core 2 duo than a slower quad?
4) If i buy the Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 "LGA775 Conroe" 3.00GHz (1333FSB) - Retail for example rather than the Q6600 wouldnt it be better and faster at most things as most things dont use dual or quad core technology and the E6850 has a faster bus and is a good few hundred mz faster, althought it has 4meg rather than 8meg cache?
Oh and i plan on using 2 gig of memory and running xp. Althought i want my setup to be future proof for vista and 4 gig of memory. Not sure on what memory im getting yet, as i have no clue but it'l be a 2 gig set, cant afford 4gig!
I do play games but not that much. I like my games to be fast and look good but this pc build is not for gaming only and i dont want to spend £x more or buy hardware especially for a particual game or 2 to run that extra 3fps!
I use my pc for office, internet, media, games, etc. But of everything. I just want it to be nippy around windows and be good for gaming and have the power to have torrents running, wmp showing a dvd and me typing on word without running like a snail.
SO anyone want to give me some advice. Please explain any advice so i know why you recommend what you do.
Im doing an upgrade from pc in sig and getting a intel setup. Now the core2duo's were very popular when they came out and everyone was raving on about them. Now i see the quads are out and the Q6600 is very popular.
So the questions...
1) Which Q6600 is everyone raving on about the energy efficiant one or the normal one? Whats the difference?
2) Whats the better chip to buy at the moment prices between £150-£200?
3) Seen as most things dont use 2 processors let alone 4 wouldnt i be better of buying a faster core 2 duo than a slower quad?
4) If i buy the Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 "LGA775 Conroe" 3.00GHz (1333FSB) - Retail for example rather than the Q6600 wouldnt it be better and faster at most things as most things dont use dual or quad core technology and the E6850 has a faster bus and is a good few hundred mz faster, althought it has 4meg rather than 8meg cache?
Oh and i plan on using 2 gig of memory and running xp. Althought i want my setup to be future proof for vista and 4 gig of memory. Not sure on what memory im getting yet, as i have no clue but it'l be a 2 gig set, cant afford 4gig!
I do play games but not that much. I like my games to be fast and look good but this pc build is not for gaming only and i dont want to spend £x more or buy hardware especially for a particual game or 2 to run that extra 3fps!
I use my pc for office, internet, media, games, etc. But of everything. I just want it to be nippy around windows and be good for gaming and have the power to have torrents running, wmp showing a dvd and me typing on word without running like a snail.
SO anyone want to give me some advice. Please explain any advice so i know why you recommend what you do.