Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2003
- Posts
- 6,980
- Location
- Surrey
My 5800X3D has a 7900XTX with it and seems to work nicely - now powering a 34" UW nicely!
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
enjoying the difference? which one did you plumb for?Thanks to the price drop on the Sapphire Pulse 9070 XT my 3080 FE is being retired.![]()
Went for the pulse 9070 XT.enjoying the difference? which one did you plumb for?
It's more about the FPS that you want. For 60 fps it's good, but if you're regularly into 120-144fps+, then it will start to fall short - unless FG is available and you're fine with that.Wow, seems a lot of you are actually using much more powerful gpus than my mere 4070 and enjoying the performance.
My 3080 FE is showing its age. Think I might need to upgrade EVeRYThING !!!
Having the same dilemma at the moment. Not had an AMD card since around 2012 when I had a Sapphire 5800 in a second build. Mainly using MSFS and being main thread/CPU limited and now I'm hitting VRAM limit on my 3080 FE. Eyeing up a new AM5 build and trying out a 9070XT.My 3080 FE is showing its age. Think I might need to upgrade EVeRYThING !!!
Yes, i mostly play battlefield games and other competitive online shooters, but do play a little of everything, some games i get well over 100fps but im gaming on a msi 1440p 240hz monitor so im usually well below the refresh rate of itIt's more about the FPS that you want. For 60 fps it's good, but if you're regularly into 120-144fps+, then it will start to fall short - unless FG is available and you're fine with that.
A more powerful GPU it will still give you 60fps at top settings while a weaker one will give you 60fps at lower details.
FWIW, I play a lot of COD, I've gone from AMD to Nvidia, and played it online MP with FSR3/frame generation and DLSS3/frame generation - neither AMD or Nvidia caused any issues with 'input latency' when winning MP matches, and I win most matches.Yes, i mostly play battlefield games and other competitive online shooters, but do play a little of everything, some games i get well over 100fps but im gaming on a msi 1440p 240hz monitor so im usually well below the refresh rate of it
and mostly playing competitive games i wont use frame gen in them, only dlss.
Do use frame gen in single player rpg and action type games if i have to like oblivion remastered for instance.
Just bought a silent base 802 pc case and im planning on upgrading my platform to 9800x3d and upping my psu to 1000w, then in the future, maybe 60 series upgrading my gpu.
Thanks for that, mostly play battlefield games but do have the occasional blast on cod, do always use dlss but have never tried frame gen in a online game yet, will give it a go and see how i get onFWIW, I play a lot of COD, I've gone from AMD to Nvidia, and played it online MP with FSR3/frame generation and DLSS3/frame generation - neither AMD or Nvidia caused any issues with 'input latency' when winning MP matches, and I win most matches.
So don't be afraid to turn on frame generation or FSR/DLSS in MP gamesSP can be a different story, but COD seems to play nice with FSR/DLSS/frame generation.
You're welcome mateThanks for that, mostly play battlefield games but do have the occasional blast on cod, do always use dlss but have never tried frame gen in a online game yet, will give it a go and see how i get on