What kind of panel is currently the best?

Soldato
Joined
14 Dec 2005
Posts
5,038
I'm looking at upgrading my monitor from an HP LP2475w 1920x1600 to a 1440p.

Bit of googling says my monitor has this... LG.Display H-IPS LM240WU4-SLA1

specs on this page http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/articles/panel_parts_content_files/sheet007.htm

It was a decent monitor when I bought it but I've not kept up with display tech (any tech actually) so wondering what I'd have to get for it to be an upgrade rather than just increasing the resolution.
Is it still as simple as IPS = better quality TN = better response time...input lag?
 
No. IPS has quite a few other negatives. Poor blacks and uneven backlight.

Input lag is separate to LCD panel type. However certain panel types pixel discharge are slower by design.

Then you have 6, 8 or 10 bit panels, FRC etc

None is simply the best.
 
dammit, can they not just make a super panel that beats all :p.. I've only browsed the first few results but googling '8 bit vs 10 bit' etc isn't exactly definitive either

this is why I still have a plasma for TV
 
dammit, can they not just make a super panel that beats all :p.. I've only browsed the first few results but googling '8 bit vs 10 bit' etc isn't exactly definitive either

this is why I still have a plasma for TV
I love my Plasma TV! I bought it just when production was pretty much stopping, was one of the last models that LG made and it'll be on my wall until it dies, have yet to see an LED tv in the same price range even come close to touching it for picture quality.
With monitors IPS is the best around right now IMO. I've had a couple of VA's (recent ones) and they just aren't as good, yes the blacks are very good but only head on, when you look at the monitor at an angle at all the colours and gamma become washed out. The last VA I tried was a 32 inch panel and even sitting head on due to the sheer size of it it's impossible to get a uniform spread of colours and gamma through out the entire panel.
As for TN that is just a complete no-no for me personally. I tried a Gsync TN before my current IPS one as I wasn't prepared to pay the price but in the end the colours and viewing angles were so bad I ended up forking out for the IPS anyway, glad I did.
 
Having owned a TN panel and now an IPS panel I would not be too bothered about going back to TN for my next display.

Having seen the woeful quality control with these high end monitors I'm loathe to spend hundreds of pounds on a display that I might have to send back and ultimately be disappointed in.
 
I love my Plasma TV! I bought it just when production was pretty much stopping, was one of the last models that LG made and it'll be on my wall until it dies, have yet to see an LED tv in the same price range even come close to touching it for picture quality.
With monitors IPS is the best around right now IMO. I've had a couple of VA's (recent ones) and they just aren't as good, yes the blacks are very good but only head on, when you look at the monitor at an angle at all the colours and gamma become washed out. The last VA I tried was a 32 inch panel and even sitting head on due to the sheer size of it it's impossible to get a uniform spread of colours and gamma through out the entire panel.
As for TN that is just a complete no-no for me personally. I tried a Gsync TN before my current IPS one as I wasn't prepared to pay the price but in the end the colours and viewing angles were so bad I ended up forking out for the IPS anyway, glad I did.

IPS backlight glow would annoy me far more than colour shift on a larger screen on the extreme sides.

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/id-3101941/acer-xb271hu-back-light-bleed.html

Granted you would not run at 100% backlight, but if you still see it in "Alien" on calibrated backlight, then it's not acceptable.

Why would you look at a monitor from a angle? This is only a problem if the angles of the extreme sides are colour phase shifted. Also with TN (the worst for angle) then a curved TN panel would sort that problem out.
 
dammit, can they not just make a super panel that beats all :p.. I've only browsed the first few results but googling '8 bit vs 10 bit' etc isn't exactly definitive either

this is why I still have a plasma for TV

They do, it's called oled :D :p

Monitor market is **** and won't improve any time soon, I got fed up with the lack of advancement and silly prices so just got an oled TV in the end. No regrets whatsoever, nukes any LCD display/monitor from orbit imo and my 29um65 is one of the best out there for iq (smooth anti glare finish, the highest rated for ips contrast ratio, black depth) too but still just no match at all for oled.

Only reason to go for monitor is:

Size
Price
G/free sync

Input lag a non issue when TV is running in 120hz mode at 1920*1080
 
CRT is the best tech.

If you take the quality control situation out of the question then in a perfect world IPS should be the best followed by VA.
 
And they have negatives as well

Banding
image retention /Burn
High Prices
Low Brightness
Try finding a 34" ultrawide one

Yeah, it's all very well banging on about using TVs as monitors, but not all of us have room or want a minimum of a 40" screen. If I wasn't at a desk then a TV would be a no-brainer, but I did think about getting a 40" TV for my desk but decided it would cause more problems than it solved.

As for the question in the OP, just pick the one you will find easiest to live with and try and be happy with it for a few years. I decided on the X34 and like most its not perfect, but I'll be keeping it for a long time if it works, and I wont be bothering to tease myself with whatever flavour of the month may or may not be around the corner.
 
And they have negatives as well

Banding
image retention /Burn
High Prices
Low Brightness
Try finding a 34" ultrawide one

banding - yup it is a lottery but nowhere near as much of a lottery as it is for monitors i.e. severe IPS glow and bleed and even then, if you get an oled with quite bad banding, it is only visible on "torture" tests i.e. split second scenes with a near all dark grey background, nowhere near as bothersome as the ips glow/bleed and just general **** blacks/contrast ratios on all lcd monitors that ruin any dark content

image retention - not had mine long enough but it seems to be a non issue for this years models, I've seen people say they have hundreds of hours raked up in gaming etc. and they have had no "permanent" burn in

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/40-ol...r-oled-tv-exhibit-image-persistence-burn.html

I've spent a couple of hours sessions playing games and not seen any on mine. If you use it for desktop usage then yeah, it might/will be an issue

High prices - depends on the person, £1500+ I would agree, anything less not really imo, you are getting a quality display and if you are already spending £900+ on a monitor then you might as well spend the extra few hundred to get arguably a superior display if size + sync tech isn't an issue

Low brightness - if you have seen one, you wouldn't be saying, mine is stupidly bright and my room has a ton of lighting, it goes far brighter than my monitor. Watching HDR content is actually quite eye straining on bright scenes....

34" ultrawide oled - precisely my point, you won't get that any time soon and when you do, you can be guaranteed the QC will be even worse, prices will be MUCH higher. That is the good thing about 55" and OLED too, create a custom 21.9 res. and you have perfect blacks so the bars on the top and bottom aren't an issue and the screen real estate is bigger than 38" 21.9 monitor still

Yeah, it's all very well banging on about using TVs as monitors, but not all of us have room or want a minimum of a 40" screen. If I wasn't at a desk then a TV would be a no-brainer, but I did think about getting a 40" TV for my desk but decided it would cause more problems than it solved.

As for the question in the OP, just pick the one you will find easiest to live with and try and be happy with it for a few years. I decided on the X34 and like most its not perfect, but I'll be keeping it for a long time if it works, and I wont be bothering to tease myself with whatever flavour of the month may or may not be around the corner.

Yup if you are intending on just having 1 display/tv as your primary monitor for everything then I certainly wouldn't get a 40+" TV, let alone an OLED one, that is why I am keeping my monitor for all desktop/browsing/work related stuff and the TV for all gaming/media related stuff.
 
Back
Top Bottom