What software do you use for o/c?

Cob · 24 Sep 2007 at 20:31

Have you tried 266x9 on the x3.0 memory multiplier?

Camalot · 24 Sep 2007 at 20:46

Cob said:
Have you tried 266x9 on the x3.0 memory multiplier?

Wouldn't that be slower?

Not sure what the memoey multiplier is doing? I take it thats not like the memory divider on a64?

Cob · 24 Sep 2007 at 20:53

Yeah it is, except the memory runs faster than the FSB rather than slower.

266 x 3.0 = 800mhz.

It would ensure that the memory can run at 800mhz.

Camalot · 24 Sep 2007 at 20:57

Cob said:
Yeah it is, except the memory runs faster than the FSB rather than slower.

266 x 3.0 = 800mhz.

It would ensure that the memory can run at 800mhz.

Will try that now, still tryin to get my head around it tho!

EDIT- Here we are, doing 266x9 on a memory multi of x3

Memory Read - 6194 6725
Memory Write - 5459 4828
Memory Copy - 5463 5368
Memory Latency -78ns 65.5nm

Lost points on write and copy, but gained on read and latency. Strange!
Which ones are the most important to get low?

Cob · 24 Sep 2007 at 21:31

Latency is the only one you want to go lower. You want the others to be as high as possible.

Camalot · 24 Sep 2007 at 21:35

Cob said:
Latency is the only one you want to go lower. You want the others to be as high as possible.

seems memory suffers on high multipliers then.

I done a test on 2x multi and memory at 400mhz cpu at 3ghz i scored over 7k on the read and 6k on everything else with latency in 60's

Just done a test with a high multi, cpu at 1.8, memory still at 400mhz but only got 5k on read 3k on the rest and 84 latency.

Wish i can sort this cooling out so i can start clocking, idle temp at 1.8ghz is 42 again >< Even dropped voltage to 1.2 (not sure if that is clever or not)

Greebo · 24 Sep 2007 at 22:29

ANybody else noticed a strange thing with core temp? When I have that loaded and try overclocking and run something stressful, orthios, dirt etc my pc falls over.

Do the same tests without coretemp running or overclock even higher and my system is stable?????

Anybody tell me why?

celliott · 25 Sep 2007 at 14:16

I use Intel TAT (Coretemp on AMD's) and Orthos

Meridian · 25 Sep 2007 at 17:42

Best stability test I know is Oblivion - it will die on systems that can run Orthos without problems.

I tend to have Asus boards, so use AsusProbe.

M

gjc10212 · 25 Sep 2007 at 18:16

I couldnt get Coretemp or TAT to run in Vista64. I use Everest Ultimate and Prime95