What the best small smart LCD / LED TV's (24" to 28") to buy these days
- Thread starter chaparral
- Start date
Small size TV is a financial suicide zone for any of the big TV makers. There are a few token products, but most of what you see outside of LG, Samsung and Philips is made by some of the same 3rd party manufacturers responsible for Bush, Polaroid, Technika, Blaupunkt and the rest of those cheap supermarket brands - and yes, sad to say it, but this even now includes Panasonic.
Personally I wouldn't buy any small smart-enabled TV when the alternative of sticking in an Amazon Firestick is just £40. This is just better by miles.
Personally I wouldn't buy any small smart-enabled TV when the alternative of sticking in an Amazon Firestick is just £40. This is just better by miles.
Guys I already have an amazon fire stick (a slow gen2 one) plugged into this 26" TV
I want to also upgrade it because it very old (has huge 2" to 3" bezels) and is very slow at turning on, changing channels, TV guide , etc
and i will use this old 26" kitchen TV to replace one the bedroom TV's which has no hdmi inputs
Some the TV's i been looking at are these ones below
Panasonic TX32FS503B
Samsung UE32N5300
Samsung UE32N5000
Samsung UE32M5520
They all only cost around £300each
I want to also upgrade it because it very old (has huge 2" to 3" bezels) and is very slow at turning on, changing channels, TV guide , etc
and i will use this old 26" kitchen TV to replace one the bedroom TV's which has no hdmi inputs
Some the TV's i been looking at are these ones below
Panasonic TX32FS503B
Samsung UE32N5300
Samsung UE32N5000
Samsung UE32M5520
They all only cost around £300each
Last edited:
You'd need to check to be sure, but Panasonic have been using Vestel - Turkish makers of a lot of the budget supermarket brand TVs - for their cheaper small TVs. There's a thread on it here from AVForums.
Samsung should be a fairly safe bet.
In general, the later in the alphabet the model number letter then the higher the model range. Then, within each model range, the higher the number the better the spec. Looking at the 3 models you list, the M5520 is a lower range than the N-series. If you just want a good, no frills TV then it's pretty good so long as the room isn't too bright. Web prices suggest it's available for under £250, but that could be a touch misleading once you click through.
Top within the three is the N5300 which gives you Freeview Play, enhanced colour reproduction and - AFAICT - some form of local dimming which means the screen is better at handling broad contrast ranges with scenes. However, you pay a hefty whack for the tech with prices around the £400 mark.
Samsung should be a fairly safe bet.
In general, the later in the alphabet the model number letter then the higher the model range. Then, within each model range, the higher the number the better the spec. Looking at the 3 models you list, the M5520 is a lower range than the N-series. If you just want a good, no frills TV then it's pretty good so long as the room isn't too bright. Web prices suggest it's available for under £250, but that could be a touch misleading once you click through.
Top within the three is the N5300 which gives you Freeview Play, enhanced colour reproduction and - AFAICT - some form of local dimming which means the screen is better at handling broad contrast ranges with scenes. However, you pay a hefty whack for the tech with prices around the £400 mark.
Thanks Lucid
Another thing I just been thinking about is that it maybe worth me saving money by buying non smart TV's and using the savings towards buying ATV for them.
As I have about 150 movies on iTunes
Also some Samsung TV's are meant to be getting an apple app later this year but I don't know if this includes there small 32" smart TV's..
Another thing I just been thinking about is that it maybe worth me saving money by buying non smart TV's and using the savings towards buying ATV for them.
As I have about 150 movies on iTunes
Also some Samsung TV's are meant to be getting an apple app later this year but I don't know if this includes there small 32" smart TV's..
Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 38,367
just buy a second hand tv.
i sold my top of the range 2 year old 55" sony tv on gumtree for £320.
so you will get a 24"-28" tv for free most likely or the best part of £50 max.
Buying a IPS monitor (for kitchen viewing environment) may work too .. I picked up a warehouse aoc ips monitor 24" , last year, for sub £100.
yes, it does not have motion interpolation/bfi, but with that ATV/other stick, would be fine.
I don't know if the kitchen environment is particularly egregious for tv's life span.
yes, it does not have motion interpolation/bfi, but with that ATV/other stick, would be fine.
I don't know if the kitchen environment is particularly egregious for tv's life span.
with living in Guernsey there not much secondhand stuff avaible and postage can cost a lot if buying secondhand from UK..
I need a TV with built in tuners..as other family members in the house likes watching loads of rubbish
Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 38,367
Get a PC monitor or just grab any TV that is cheap.
All TVs below 50" these days are much of a muchness and everything below 40" is garbage.
The market isn't calling for high quality 28" TVs
... small freeview box then, not sure how much the nowtv ones run at;
afaik roku don't do one, otherwise, might be able to phone cast + plex too.
Sorry folks, but talk of using PC monitors and external Freeview boxes just to watch a bit of telly in the kitchen really is a complete load of nonsense. These are bachelor / nerd solutions. They're okay for someone a bit techie who lives alone, but not really for people whose partners just want an easy life. Keep it simple; go for a 28" or a 32" TV with a HD tuner and an aerial feed. That's job done for the Missus.
For smart features, really, go for whatever works. If that's an ATV because that matches content already owned, then sure. You've a better chance with that than anything the TV manufacturers can cobble up.
The TV manufacturers never really got to grips with integrating a decent set of smart features. Partly this is to do with their distinctly 20th Century mindset. They're still focussed on hardware solutions. They never worked out how to make money from content in the way that Netflix, Amazon, Apple and Now TV (Sky) has, and nor did they form the sort of strategic alliances with the smarter players in the market to co-opt or leverage their tech. Sony really should have had the best shout at doing this. Of all of the big electronics brands, they're the ones with film, TV and music production arms; but it wasn't to be. As a result, the TV makers are constantly behind the curve. Their platforms are designed around the idea of corralling the user experience within a tightly-controlled suite of hobbled apps that they have insufficient funding to support beyond a couple of years from launch. IOW, Netflix, iPlayer, Youtube and the rest on a smart TV may look like the versions you on your phone or tablet or other smart-enabled devices, but they're really just a version or interpretation of the basic framework, and although built from some of the same core ingredients, there are enough differences that make them a virtual cul-de-sac.
The crucial differences with 3rd party devices are that the hardware is designed with some longer-term degree of software support in mind, and the companies behind ATV, Amazon Firestick, Now TV, and the rest have deeper pockets.
For smart features, really, go for whatever works. If that's an ATV because that matches content already owned, then sure. You've a better chance with that than anything the TV manufacturers can cobble up.
The TV manufacturers never really got to grips with integrating a decent set of smart features. Partly this is to do with their distinctly 20th Century mindset. They're still focussed on hardware solutions. They never worked out how to make money from content in the way that Netflix, Amazon, Apple and Now TV (Sky) has, and nor did they form the sort of strategic alliances with the smarter players in the market to co-opt or leverage their tech. Sony really should have had the best shout at doing this. Of all of the big electronics brands, they're the ones with film, TV and music production arms; but it wasn't to be. As a result, the TV makers are constantly behind the curve. Their platforms are designed around the idea of corralling the user experience within a tightly-controlled suite of hobbled apps that they have insufficient funding to support beyond a couple of years from launch. IOW, Netflix, iPlayer, Youtube and the rest on a smart TV may look like the versions you on your phone or tablet or other smart-enabled devices, but they're really just a version or interpretation of the basic framework, and although built from some of the same core ingredients, there are enough differences that make them a virtual cul-de-sac.
The crucial differences with 3rd party devices are that the hardware is designed with some longer-term degree of software support in mind, and the companies behind ATV, Amazon Firestick, Now TV, and the rest have deeper pockets.
You're 100% right I wanted these small TV's so everyone could easily use them by it own single remote control and to have a very clean setup with as less wires & components as possible..
I ended up buying two Samsung 32" M5520 smart TV's which i received in the post yesterday they seem perfect for what I mainly wanted so far...
Last edited:
You're 100% right I wanted these small TV's so everyone could easily use them by it own single remote control and to have a very clean setup with as less wires & components as possible..
I ended up buying two Samsung 32" M5520 smart TV's which i received in the post yesterday they seem perfect for what I mainly wanted so far...
Very happy with mine too, sound is surprisingly good, way better than the H6400 it replaced.