Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2004
- Posts
- 14,315
- Location
- Peoples Republic of Histonia, Cambridge
He's right. It was definitely more of a large boom, preceded by a small pop and followed by a long squeal.There wasn't a big bang.
He's right. It was definitely more of a large boom, preceded by a small pop and followed by a long squeal.There wasn't a big bang.
Devil's advocate here, but;
(and I'm not some hippy, more of a philosophiserer)
How can you be sure that a physical universe exists? If 'something', essentially being created from 'nothing' seem implausible, then why can't it be that the whole universe and existence is a subjective view, and that actually 'reality' is a construction of our psyche and subconscious mind?
Wow, deep for this time of night.![]()
What was there before the BIG BANG?
An overclocker cranking up the vcore.
Devil's advocate here, but;
(and I'm not some hippy, more of a philosophiserer)
How can you be sure that a physical universe exists? If 'something', essentially being created from 'nothing' seem implausible, then why can't it be that the whole universe and existence is a subjective view, and that actually 'reality' is a construction of our psyche and subconscious mind?
Wow, deep for this time of night.![]()
A singularity.
As you can see, plenty spin going onanyone got a spin on this?
so the Doppler effect has kinda proved the universe is expanding like a baloon - which is great, but rewind about a trillion years until it was the size of a pin head, and then a few more years..... there would be nothing...... no elements....no light....no darkness..... no time............nothing........literally nothing.............. it does not compute.
but then how could there be nothing? because even an absence of something is.....well something.
anyone got a spin on this?