What's better ?

[monster_munch]

3700 San D, or the 3800 Venice.

People told me it was the 3700 San D, but in most of these tests

http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html?modelx=33&model1=241&model2=245&chart=62

the 3800 came out on top...

Are they lieing to me...

My spec is... it's a games machine...

http://tinypic.com/kbygrc.jpg

 

[[Death]]

get the 3700 SD, its a way better overclock, u will hit 2.7-2.8 no probs, thats fx speeds

 

[jdc]

I vote San Diego.

The Athlon 64 and S939 Opteron are both San Diego - you mightwant an Opteron instead (depending on price and if you want to overclock).

 

[Xplo]

San Diego it has more cache and once overclocked it owns

 

[daven1986]

3700+ more cache.

 

[Naffa]

listen to these guys the 3800 out performs it as it clocks higher, but the 3700 can be overclocked to speeds that will out perform the 3800 by a long way.

 

[Hunders]

I have my 3700 SD running at 2.8GHz(FX-57 speeds) on stock volts and stock cooling.. The max temp I have seen on this is 46 degrees under full load..

Its a great overclocker.