Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
You save a few £££'s but lose two years of warranty.
I have had a few oem in the past when the price difference was bigger and all have been bad clockers.
Always buy retail and only accept a sealed box.
They also have a few hundred of them aswell, wont go oos so fastThat's a fair point, thanks!
OCuk have cheekily put up prices by £20 on the 8400Plus the 8400 so far shows in benchmarks equal performance for less money.
OCuk have cheekily put up prices by £20 on the 8400
Plus the 8400 so far shows in benchmarks equal performance for less money.
It does perform better in some games and applications, also I'm sure it will age much better than the 8400.If this is true why is it far cheaper, surely the 8600k must do something better for the price.
Primarily due to how turbo boost works it looks better on paper (all-core turbo makes the 8400 have very similar base clock really, but that's not what the advertising spec looks like), and people equate spending more with getting more so assume it's worth the extra. Intel want to make more monies so don't want to dissuade people of this view, but also need to compete in lower-priced segments hence have both products.If this is true why is it far cheaper, surely the 8600k must do something better for the price.
Don't overclockers bin oem cpu's and keep the highest clocking ones for the bundles?
NODon't overclockers bin oem cpu's and keep the highest clocking ones for the bundles?
No they are not. This has been covered 10 times at least.The OEM's could be retails that failed to overclock?
I really think someone at Overclockers needs to write a sticky post about this.