Can't say I've extensively researched this, but took a look and there seems to a huge hole between 32" and 43" monitors @ 16:9.
I have a 34" Ultrawide. I was wondering about changing to a 16:9 monitor that would preserve the width I've become used to, so I wouldn't have to downgrade in that area to get more vertical goodness.
Where once ultrawide gave extra room on the sides, now it feels more like it's deducting from the vertical.
Using an online calculator, surprisingly it would only take a ~36+" monitor at 16:9 to match the horizontal of my 34" ultrawide.
So where are these monitors? I can either downgrade to a 32" 16:9 or go hyper-massive at 43" from what I'm seeing (and arguably those 43" seem to be more TV-like than PC-monitor like)?
I have a 34" Ultrawide. I was wondering about changing to a 16:9 monitor that would preserve the width I've become used to, so I wouldn't have to downgrade in that area to get more vertical goodness.
Where once ultrawide gave extra room on the sides, now it feels more like it's deducting from the vertical.
Using an online calculator, surprisingly it would only take a ~36+" monitor at 16:9 to match the horizontal of my 34" ultrawide.
So where are these monitors? I can either downgrade to a 32" 16:9 or go hyper-massive at 43" from what I'm seeing (and arguably those 43" seem to be more TV-like than PC-monitor like)?