Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Posts
- 8,731
- Location
- Cornwall
Hi,
I've currently got a Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H motherboard running a 1055T @3.5GHz (although I believe it can do 3.8GHz).
To be honest I'm not a fan of the motherboard. One reason being that the current board is an RMA replacement as the original caught fire!!! (Yes I'm being serious)
Also not a fan of the perpendicular SATA connectors that interfere with the coolers on long-ish graphics cards.
And having issues getting the PWM CPU header to control my pump speed nicely.
So, thinking of getting a new motherboard and since I'm hoping to move my rig into another case soon, this might be the time to get one. Ideally one that doesn't suffer the issues listed above (especially the catching fire bit, that is quite a high priority
)
Other than that I'd like to keep it pretty inexpensive, so definitely under £100.
Does the motherboard have any affect on the voltage needed to get a cpu overclock stable? I'd like the board to be able to get me to at least a 3.5GHz overclock, hopefully 3.8GHz and anything else is a bonus. the easier the overclocking the better! I will be watercooling, but would rather it all run as cool as possible as I'd like the watercooling to be quiet.
I'm also thinking an AM3+ board would be nice to allow me to upgrade to Bulldozer if it turns out to be any good.
It doesn't need SATA3 or USB3, but I'm guessing most probably will and that's a bonus.
Currently the plan is to run a with a single GTX 480 (watercooled). Not expecting to go to 480SLI, but the more complete the graphics options supported the better. (i.e. SLI + CF > CF > single GPU)
So what are my options or am I asking the impossible?
I'm sure I've read there are teething issues with (some of) the 990 chipsets, do these apply across the 900 series and have they been fixed yet?
Thanks for any help.
I've currently got a Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H motherboard running a 1055T @3.5GHz (although I believe it can do 3.8GHz).
To be honest I'm not a fan of the motherboard. One reason being that the current board is an RMA replacement as the original caught fire!!! (Yes I'm being serious)
Also not a fan of the perpendicular SATA connectors that interfere with the coolers on long-ish graphics cards.
And having issues getting the PWM CPU header to control my pump speed nicely.
So, thinking of getting a new motherboard and since I'm hoping to move my rig into another case soon, this might be the time to get one. Ideally one that doesn't suffer the issues listed above (especially the catching fire bit, that is quite a high priority
)Other than that I'd like to keep it pretty inexpensive, so definitely under £100.
Does the motherboard have any affect on the voltage needed to get a cpu overclock stable? I'd like the board to be able to get me to at least a 3.5GHz overclock, hopefully 3.8GHz and anything else is a bonus. the easier the overclocking the better! I will be watercooling, but would rather it all run as cool as possible as I'd like the watercooling to be quiet.
I'm also thinking an AM3+ board would be nice to allow me to upgrade to Bulldozer if it turns out to be any good.
It doesn't need SATA3 or USB3, but I'm guessing most probably will and that's a bonus.
Currently the plan is to run a with a single GTX 480 (watercooled). Not expecting to go to 480SLI, but the more complete the graphics options supported the better. (i.e. SLI + CF > CF > single GPU)
So what are my options or am I asking the impossible?
I'm sure I've read there are teething issues with (some of) the 990 chipsets, do these apply across the 900 series and have they been fixed yet?
Thanks for any help.