Which Assassins Creed am I missing?

Kosmiche · 24 Jun 2012 at 18:39

I used to like free roam games, I think the last time I was into them though was when I had a PS2 and playing the GTA's.

If I play a game like that now, I don't mess around I just play the missions.

T345 · 24 Jun 2012 at 18:39

I usually finish a game first, then free roam, but back on topic

chipachap · 24 Jun 2012 at 19:32

Eames said:
No its not.

Please that is such a weak comparison that makes no sense whatsoever.

He's dead right it is the exact same thing over and over. It's all about the story.

Swi1ch · 24 Jun 2012 at 19:50

I think the general idea is if you enjoyed AC2, you will enjoy Brotherhood, and if you enjoyed Brotherhood, you'll enjoy Revelations.

CaptainRAVE · 24 Jun 2012 at 20:05

chipachap said:
It's all about the story.

I am certainly addicted to the story. It is unfolding a little too slowly for my liking, but I am absolutely engrossed in it.

T345 · 24 Jun 2012 at 20:08

I haven't played revelations, but completed the rest, I need to get revelations!, The story is amazing

WingZero30 · 24 Jun 2012 at 21:45

AWPC said:
AC1 is the best the others are just effectively mods/map packs. This series is still stuck in 2008 on PC..............

Do you mean graphics wise?

I am playing brotherhood atm and currently on sequence 5. For some reason I can't seem to call horse anymore. The option has gone

AWPC · 24 Jun 2012 at 23:03

WingZero30 said:
Do you mean graphics wise?

I am playing brotherhood atm and currently on sequence 5. For some reason I can't seem to call horse anymore. The option has gone

Everything wise

I mean AC1 had a massive development budget Ubisoft really put a lot of effort into it & PC especially is much better looking & even has several features consoles never got like extragame modes & a few other minor PC only stuff like DX10 (which helps FPS a lot consoles had trouble running that game without massive screen tearing & constant FPS drops + lots of ingame loading).

AC2 was terrible in every way as were the other games just more of the same but less of it Ubisoft have just cut n pasted the same formula to sell the game to console owners every winter IMO

AC1 for 2008 on PC was a step ahead & stunning technical achievement when you can have so much detail in the sometime vast cities with no ingame loading & smooth FPS. Sure the gameplay is similar to GTA4 & samey (like most modern games) but the gameworld environment/atmosphere was/is impressive IMO

Operation · 24 Jun 2012 at 23:13

Came agree with that. AC 2 is miles better than AC 1 and the best of the lot imo. It's a great game. And Brotherhood is better than Revelations.

chipachap · 24 Jun 2012 at 23:52

Operation said:
Came agree with that. AC 2 is miles better than AC 1 and the best of the lot imo. It's a great game. And Brotherhood is better than Revelations.

I agree fully. They're going to put too much effort into online (which hardly anyone will play) instead of focusing on a huge map with detail and a long in-depth story. AC2 had no online, was f'in huge and had no online. Brotherhood had a good story but was only 1/3 the length of two and online isn't half as fun as the story.

Although I liked Brotherhood and Revelations equally, AC2 is king IMO.

Anyone know where we can make suggestions to Ubisoft?