Which daily overclock would you run?

Associate
Joined
31 May 2007
Posts
394
Hey everyone I'm curious as to what peoples opinions are as to which of the following overclocks you would run on a daily basis. Both are stable and I don't believe either have a dangerous voltage or too high a temp but is the jump to 4.8 worth the step up in volts? Here are the Overclocks anyway the CPU is under water.

4.7GHz @ 1.285v 66c max
4.8GHz @ 1.355v 73c max

I've not attempted 4.9GHz as I believe the jump in volts would need to be excessive.
Many thanks

Paul.
IMG_12961_zpsqgjdwpxs.jpg
 
Last edited:
I run mine 100 mhz under its max for daily use, that last 100 mhz does require quite a big volt increase, i bet for 4.9 you would be looking at 1.43v looking at the increase needed for 4.8.

Just run at what ever your comfortable with as its you that has to live with the extra fan noise or heat by running it faster. I know when my room starts getting real hot in summer i start limiting my overclocks so i dont get too hot my self.
 
Even dropping down to 4.4 giving lower volta and temps, you wouldnot notice the differance.

My 5820K will quite happily run at 4.5 1.29v 24/7 with temps in the mid fiftys, but l'v dropped it to 4.2 for gaming and other tasks.
 
Given the choice between 4.7GHz and 4.8GHz, I'd go for 4.5GHz. :D

You're never going to notice the difference of an extra 4 to 7% over 4.5GHz unless you're mostly benchmarking rather than actually using the PC. I know it's fun to chase the last couple of hundred MHz, but it doesn't really make a significant real-world difference except in terms of power consumption and heat output.

PS Grats on the rig. It looks absolutely stunning! :cool:
 
Last edited:
Given the choice between 4.7GHz and 4.8GHz, I'd go for 4.5GHz. :D

You're never going to notice the difference of an extra 4 to 7% over 4.5GHz unless you're mostly benchmarking rather than actually using the PC. I know it's fun to chase the last couple of hundred MHz, but it doesn't really make a significant real-world difference except in terms of power consumption and heat output.

PS Grats on the rig. It looks absolutely stunning! :cool:

This ^^
I used to OC my Phenom x6 hard (3.8 @ 1.48v) but it was really hot and cost me a fortune in electricity, it was a 140W TDP :eek:
In the end I ran it undervolted at stock with CnQ enabled lol

As has been said, that extra 100mhz will make no real-world difference, it will only affect benchmarking, hell even at stock you would not notice much difference.
I would personally back it off to 4.5 and drop the volts :)
 
Back
Top Bottom