Bit poor for representation for series like Fallout with large generation gaps between them. It's unlikely that most of the people who voted in this poll would have played the original back in the day and so don't have a very accurate impression of just how amazing it was back then - comparatively, both were worlds ahead of FO3 or NV in their respective settings.
Which franchises are getting better, which are getting worse? The PC Gamer poll results
- Thread starter Final8y
- Start date
Haha, I wonder...
Fallout should be at the bottom.such an abomination to the original two. Such a waste of money as well. In fact all the big games I've purchased in the last few years have been pants.
Agree!
Anyone who thinks Fallout is improving hasn't played 1 & 2. FO3 and NV don't even come close.
There was a discussion about this in another thread, but I have played them all many times and I think NV is the best. Not much better than FO2, but superior imo.
I think New Vegas is hard done by. I get the impression that people are not willing to give it enough of a chance
Associate
- Joined
- 7 Sep 2007
- Posts
- 1,222
- Location
- UK
Deus EX HR was clearly far far far better than number 2 and I felt it was a worthy sequel to the first game. Half-life has kept a pretty level bar of quality in my opinion, and I found DoW2 to be a completely different style of game to the first but it was equally enjoyable to me (if anything the multi-player being more skill based meant I played it more).