• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

which is better? NVidia Riva TNT2 vs Geforce Mx400

hey, dont knock it, pacman rocks on an mx400 :D


PACMAN.JPG
 
Last edited:
Zefan said:
That MX is a geforce 4 - albeit a completely stripped down one.
Click to expand...

MX4xx series of cards were based on the Geforce 2 GTS platform, and as such are not Geforce 4's even cut-down ones.
 
Just been to customers house, he has old crap PC, his sons new game wont run on G-Force4 MX 4XX, (installs wont start) min specs are G-Force 2 GTS so thats probably true either the lowend G4 are lower end G2 tech or just thats G2 GTS is mid/high end and G4 MX is low end, I had G 2 GTS ULtra in 2001.

I seem to remember one of 1st games not to support G-Force 4 MX range was Thief 3 Deadly Shadows (think titles correct) and this was offical in the games spec .Doc.
 
There were several Geforce 2 MX cards:

MX200
MX
MX400

The MX200 had a lower clockspeed and a 64bit SD memory interface, the MX\MX400 are 64bit DDR\128bit SD and clocked higher.

None of the cards mentioned in this thread support pixel shaders, but the fastest is the Geforce 2 Ultra followed by the GTS then the GF4 MX.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom