which is more economical?

Caporegime
Joined
7 Mar 2003
Posts
28,189
Location
Krispy Kreme drive thru
say your doing a journey, all 1 road.

is it more economical to:

get to optimum cruising speed as fast as possible then cruise at the best speed for economy

or

slowy get to the most economic speed then cruise


I know that distance will have a factor, but how for for it to make a difference?
 
it uses more fuel but for less time, then cruises for longer. where as doing it slowly uses less fuel than the other option, but for a longer period of time.
 
Probably cruising slowly up to speed.

Personally I just floor it up to cruising speed, then just knock it into 5th :) It probably doesn't matter either way.
 
Didn't Top Gear do some test to check this? (maybe fith gear?)
ragg it until you reach 30mph or whatever your cruising speed is going to be, then stick it in a high gear at lower revs... :confused:
 
I would have thought run a petrol engine flat out *** for cc efficiency in as big a gear without the engine labouring, skipping every other gear, ie. 2 -> 4 -> 6
 
siztenboots said:
I would have thought run a petrol engine flat out *** for cc efficiency in as big a gear without the engine labouring, skipping every other gear, ie. 2 -> 4 -> 6

When you skip a gear, you have to put your foot down. Even though the engine wont be reving high, you are still uses a lot of petrol to bring the car upto speed.
 
Back
Top Bottom