Which is worth it more?

Soldato
Joined
13 Jan 2004
Posts
12,748
Location
Leicestershire
5.7 manual Cheverolet Corvette or 5.7 manual Vauxhall Monaro.

Typically £15k each but with the Monaro you'd buy a 40,000 mile 05/05 plate one. With the corvette you'd still be talking 40,000 miles but it's be a 1998 one(a C4/C5??).

What makes a Corvette so much better? Same Engine essentially and looks wise lets assume they are equal. A vette looks more 'intense' and fun whereas a Monaro looks like a big saloon car.

Why such a difference? I get a vette is a £60k car new and a Monaro is a £25k car new but why is the resale so much higher on the Monaro?
 
Last edited:
[TW]Fox;16029176 said:
I would imagine they don't drive similarily at all :confused:

I would have thought similar but i seem to remember clarkson loving the hoolign nature of the monaro and although slightly more focused (noticible by someone who isnt a race driver?) the performance from the engine would be similar as 0-60 in 6.5 and under for the monaro and 4.7 for the Vette. The monaro 0-60 is hard to gather as some places reckon 6 seconds is too long for the monaro as it feels quicker. :confused:

I get that the vette is more refined but howso?
 
I would have thought similar but i seem to remember clarkson loving the hoolign nature of the monaro and although slightly more focused (noticible by someone who isnt a race driver?) the performance from the engine would be similar as 0-60 in 6.5 and under for the monaro and 4.7 for the Vette. The monaro 0-60 is hard to gather as some places reckon 6 seconds is too long for the monaro as it feels quicker. :confused:

I get that the vette is more refined but howso?

on parkers the Monaro is 5.2 - 6s depending on the age. Vette was a C5.
 
[TW]Fox;16029225 said:
What? You think 0-60 in 4.7 and 0-60 in 6 seconds is similar?!

0-60 in 6 seconds is quick normal saloon land and 0-60 in 4.7 seconds is supercar territory, a Ferrari F355 is slower!

They are completely different cars which happen to share a similar engine. Thats all there is to it.

Having never had a 6s 0-60 car i can only imagine and 1s isn't that impressive. certainly not £20k impressive. lol.

I was just wondering what makes a Vette so special bar the badge.

ok, so its marginally quicker to 60 but how does it compare handling wise and reliability wise? :confused:
 
I was just wondering. Average to me would be 0-60 in about 3s like my motorbike lol. I know very little about cars like this and was just wondering.

Noted though. The covette 'looks' like a nice car whereas the Monaro looks like a big saloon car and the Corvette justifies its extra price tag by being quicker overall. It is mainly the looks though. :)
 
[TW]Fox;16031551 said:
Even a Bugatti Veyron wont do 0-60 in 3.0 seconds :confused:

Yet you think thats average car performance?!

dunno, not fussed in trying tbh. :) cars in my eyes will never beat a bike for performance to the pound. only true supercars would come close.

2009 BMWS1000RR is a good example of what bikes can do and it's less than a mondeo. :)
 
I don't buy this "Completely different car" thing, it is not like we are comparing chalk with cheese here. Both are 2 door coupes tailored towards being "GT" cars rather than out and out sports cars.

Kinda what i was thinking initially. i can see the arguament now though. the Corvette is more a supercar whereas the Monaro is more the car next doors got.

I dunno......... lol
 
and everyboooooooooooooody breeeeaatthhe. :):o:p:eek:

Get back to the original question. Forget pther cars/bikes etc.

I get that the vette is 'marginally' quicker and looks prettier. Is that it? :p

If we were to be looking at Vettes as part'supercar' there is always the case of the Ferrari 456GT at amazingly good 2nd hand value with a 5.5l V12, 0-60 in 5s and a top speed of about 190mph. ;) it's not much more than a Vette..... ;):eek::D
 
Back
Top Bottom