Which Overclockers Gaming System? 3dmark/other benchmarking results?

jonny_red

jonny_red

jonny_red

Associate
Joined
25 Sep 2014
Posts
3
Hello all

I'm on the hunt for a new PC to replace my current overclockers system which is getting a bit long in the tooth. I want to be able to play stuff like Elder Scrolls, ARMA 3 and Football Manager with good FPS but my budget is limited so the real high end stuff is out of the equation. I like the idea of the smaller form factor stuff but be happy to sacrifice this for a standard sized system that has substantially better performance.

I'll also need a new OS as I'm currently running Windows XP so would welcome feedback on what I should go for here.

I've narrowed it down to the following options but wanted to get some further advice/information (e.g. benchmarking results) that I can take a look at to get some comparison of which is the best option.

  • Defender X6" AMD FX-6 6300 @ 4.1GHz Turbo AMD Radeon Six Core Gaming PC
  • ForceBox Gamer Plus" Intel Core i5 4670 3.4GHz (3.8GHz Turbo) Quad Core Nvidia GTX Special Edition Gaming PC
  • Liberator X6" AMD FX-6 6300 @ 4.1GHz Turbo Nvidia GeForce Six Core Gaming PC
  • ForceBox Gamer" Intel Core i3 / i5 / i7 Nvidia GTX LAN Gaming PC
  • Titan Machete" Intel Core i5 4690 @ 3.9GHz Turbo Nvidia GeForce Gaming PC

I'm getting a bit long in the tooth (as well as my PC) so I'm totally out of the loop now when it comes to processors/video cards and memory so any advice would be much appreciated.

'fanks all!


JR
 
Whats your budget? Thats the first question.

Most people will say go for the intel systems over the AMDs because of stronger processing power - will get more fps in most games
 
whats your budget? If you let us know what you're willing to spend, someone could spec you up a rig and you could pay to have it build and OC'd by OCUK if you wish; you might end up getting a bit more for your money rather than buying a pre-built.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom