Which phisique?

NitrogenY3K · 28 Jan 2006 at 18:32

Considering that there are quite a few people on here who are into bodybuilding/powerlifting or just casual gym goers I was wondering how big do you people want to be and what is your ideal body? :

(stole this from another forum)

Bruce lee
Guy in CK boxer shorts in a next calalogue (ponce)
Guy on front of Mens Health
Big as possible without using gear 24/7/365
A MONSTER PRO OR BIGGER

Personally i want to be a monster pro and would love to be able to compete at a high level one day, i know loads of people think its disgusting but I admire these people and what they go through to get to where they are today, and would love to be a pro bodybuilder

Random question, but i was just curious

NitrogenY3K · 29 Jan 2006 at 13:06

cleanbluesky said:
Tyler Durden in Fight Club

Which for my build equates roughly to Mens Health option... which I am just under now - hopefully in a few months

Nitro, what sort of size are you currently?

Currently at 15st, 15" arms 44" chest 36" waist, so not big at all (even tho ive been told by a few people im big and "your on the gear arnt you" lol, but i think these people are generally blind because if im big, well I dunno what the world is comig to. Used to be nearly 18st which was big (of fat tho lol). Goals for this year are: and if i can achieve this i wil be happy, so then i can move onto my next set of goals.

Weight - 16st
bf % - 14%
Deadlift (1rm) 245k
Squat (1rm) - 210k
Bench (1rm) - 160k
Biceps - 16"
Waist - 34"
Legs 28"
Chest - 47"
Calves - 17.5"

NitrogenY3K · 29 Jan 2006 at 18:05

Vegeta said:
Exactly what I was going to say, too big = ugly to me, IMO your meant to look athletic and the word I like to use is "Healthy".
I think it's probably harder achieving a Tyler Durden sort of body than a body with huge muscles - I was working out my biceps for only a month and they look massivly out of proportion to the rest of my body so i stopped - its much harder being small + little amounts of fat + showing all muscles.

I very much doubt you trained your biceps for only a month and they looked massivly out of proportion, and no brad pitt is just very skinny in that film and is not hard to get to that size at all, what is hard is getting to 18st+ with 8% bf

NitrogenY3K · 29 Jan 2006 at 20:58

cleanbluesky said:
Disproportionate (but then again, that looks like it was just after a work-out)

Like Bruce Lee said, strength does not neccessarily mean size - would rather be Brad Pitt size and very strong...

Is that Craig from Big Brother 1?

How is he Disproportionate?

NitrogenY3K · 30 Jan 2006 at 17:57

This is a fantasic phisique: none of theis brad pitt noncence

NitrogenY3K · 30 Jan 2006 at 20:56

Well dunno about free but they were legal

NitrogenY3K · 30 Jan 2006 at 21:01

Ow yes he was on them, they popped d-bol like they were skittles back then.

NitrogenY3K · 30 Jan 2006 at 21:13

awsome, lucky bugger having free gear :eek:

NitrogenY3K · 30 Jan 2006 at 21:18

Phnom_Penh said:
lucky bugger at having gear tbh.

Wonder if it shrunk his you know whats

Well his balls would have likely have shrunk a bit if he was doing quite heavy cycles, mind you some people are susptable to shirnkage even off quite mild ones because of natural testosterone being shut down. I wonder if they knoew about PCT/HRT back then

NitrogenY3K · 31 Jan 2006 at 16:25

nero120 said:
Although I personally wouldn't want to be this size, I think this is a good picture of him:

What an awsome photo, he looks outstanding

Coleman is the man tho:

NitrogenY3K · 31 Jan 2006 at 16:40

Gilly said:
That is disgusting.

I think it's amazing :eek:

NitrogenY3K · 31 Jan 2006 at 17:00

cleanbluesky said:
Coleman is OTT - he has an unnatural look

Bescause he IS un-natural lmao

Coleman is genetically blessed the same as arnols and is no average jo, arnold wasn't natural by far and obviously had awsome genetics but in this day an age with the advances in nutrition/training/supps and the introduction of things like IGF arnold would be far far bigger if he competed today he would be there with coleman

NitrogenY3K · 3 Feb 2006 at 18:45

I mean lets be honest there is a diference between organised fights and a street fight, all it needs is a lucky punch, the other bloke might be very technical etc but if tyson caught him, good night i dont care how hard he is he is going to be out cold.

NitrogenY3K · 4 Feb 2006 at 11:55

Balddog said:
That goes both ways doesnt it?

No matter how good tyson is, hes bloody rubbish at any kind of ground fighting, or defending against kicks or whatever...even the simplest of submission moves would take him out of any fight...

Yeh it does should have said that really

thats what i mean the other bloke would murder tyson in every aspect of fighting but tyson could just catch him sweet and thats that. Same the other way round one sweet hit and tyson is out.

Depth said:
There are fighters who could take a punch from Tyson and carry on fighting fine, such as Ray Sefo, David Tua or Mark Hunt (all, coincidentally, are pacific islander's).

Watch this match up to see two of the best chins in the fight game:http://www.youtube.com/w/Ray-Sefo-V...rch=mark hunt

I meant bare knucke i honestly cant see people carrying on after tyson has caught them with a good punch in the chops look at the damage he canb inflict with gloves on :eek: