• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

which processor to get?

Associate
Joined
19 Sep 2008
Posts
344
Hi guys,

I have an E8500 in my current rig but i am considering buying a Q6600 at the end of next week. Is this a worth while upgrade? or is it a downgrade? because what i hope to acheive by doing this is getting a straight 5.9 windows vista rating without having to overclock and i want to avoid buying a big, beffy processor since i will be upgrading again at the end of the year to the nehalem processor.

cheers.


Myth.
 
Ignore the Vista rating. It means next-to-nothing.


What do you use your computer for? If it's mainly for games then the E8500 is grand. If it's mostly video or design work then a quad-core would be an advantage.

You also have to remember that a Q6600 is over 25% slower than an E8500 in software that runs only one or two threads (before any overclocking is taken into account ofcourse).
 
i dont overclock any of my systems, period, to be honest i dont beleive in overclocking. But a lot of the review sites have said stick with core duos for the time being since the nehalem processors are coming just around the corner.

I use my pc for a lot of video converting (winavi) and gaming and general use, the one thing that puts me off buying a quad core at the minute is the lack of support for quad core processors in software applications.
 
I would stick with the E8500 tbh. Most video software now supports quad-cores (tho i'm not sure about Winavi as I haven't used it for a long time), but the difference between an E8500 @ 3.16ghz and a Q6600 @ 2.4ghz wouldn't be worth the change (considering how quickly todays processors can convert .avi to DVD. Even my current E2180 running at 1.8ghz can convert a 2 hour .avi to DVD in a little over 30 mins with ConvertXtoDVD. My quad-cores were faster at it, but only by a matter of minutes).


Wait for Nehalem.
 
well, what i was considering was this.

I am currently using an MSI X48C motherboard which doesnt like DDR3 memory and only has 4 sata ports.

I have 3 150GB Raptor X HDD's, i am only using 2 at the minute cos of the lack of sata ports on my motherboard (i have 2 sata dvd burners) and i also have 3 GB of 1600Mhz DDR3 memory which the board wont handle. Now if i bought either an Asus P5Q3 Deluxe or an Asus P5E3 Intel X38 and a 150GB Velociraptor (instead of the Q6600 and raided all of the 4 raptors together since they are all 150GB in size) that should provide quite a boost in system performance until one of the 1366 motherboards/processors come out later in the year. What do you think of that idea?
 
Back
Top Bottom