Which Thermal Paste to get please

Can't go wrong with artic silver 5.
Actually it hasn't been top performer in decade.
Though it's certainly not bad, but why take risks with possible electric conductivity when there are better non-conductive pastes?

Also AS5 doesn't seem to be rated for easiest spreading/using:
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/thermal-paste-comparison,5108-13.html
I don't think there's any other as big comparison:
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/thermal-paste-comparison,5108-9.html
 
I haven't upgraded in quite a while, is the thermal paste really changed that much? In the process of an upgrade so better change what I was going to use. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Actually it hasn't been top performer in decade.
Though it's certainly not bad, but why take risks with possible electric conductivity when there are better non-conductive pastes?

Also AS5 doesn't seem to be rated for easiest spreading/using:
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/thermal-paste-comparison,5108-13.html
I don't think there's any other as big comparison:
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/thermal-paste-comparison,5108-9.html

That is because AS5 was not designed for spreading despite quite a few people persisting in doing so - the original application notes even said not to but they seem to have changed it more recently to be more tolerant of spreading (it is still not optimal). Possibly because so many keep using it that way.

It also takes a few more heat cycles than most pastes before it reaches optimal performance.

Both factors often aren't taken into account in comparisons - often under some misguided idea of "consistency".
 
I used Arctic MX4 last time, seems to work well (PC specs in sig, CPU usually sits in the low 40's when gaming and in the 50's when benching).

I used AS5 for years before that, which also worked well.

To be honest, unless you're trying to break world records I don't think it makes much difference. Just pick a flavour you like. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom