Which version of Microsoft Server do I need?

[d_brennen]

Been asked to setup a network of 5 computers with one server in a basic office. It has been a while since I have done anything like this but I still have a grasp of Server 2003 AD and users etc.

I have the 5 computers and server. The PCs are running XP Pro

Would be tempted to tell them to get someone else to do it but money is tight and these people need to do it right with regards to software licenses etc.

What version of Server should I go with?

 

[d_brennen]

Well you haven't said what you want to do with it. If you want Exchange (I recommend you don't) then go with SBS2008. If not, Windows Server 2008 Foundation.

Good point. They don't need Exchange at this stage but maybe in the future. TBH the only server packages I have used is 2003 standard.

All they require at the moment is a server that controls access to files, centralised backup and possibly remote access.

Do you know if Foundation supports up 15 users "out of the box" and not a seperate purchase of CALs?

 

[d_brennen]

SBS2008 it is. Found a copy of SBS2008 5 CAL OEM for £475ex from the wholesaler I use. Prices online seem to vary!

 

[d_brennen]

The only limitation ive found on SBS is you cant run another domain controler in the same network which can be a pain but I dont think you will have a issue with that.

Well if there is any possibility of requiring a second domain controller you wouldn't use SBS. Though if you are considering SBS in the first place there is a pretty damn good chance you wont be looking for a second DC anyway.

Thanks for all the input guys. SBS is the way I am going on this one. Hope all I know of 2003 is easily transferable

There isn't much chance of the server ever coming in contact with a second DC. To be honest I think the company will have gone bust long before that becomes a concern lol. Money up front for everything!

Why not use a Linux OS?

While I like the idea of Linux, and have played about with a couple of distros, I don't think it is a viable option. People know Windows. Say what you like about Microsoft (or M$ if your that way inclined), they make a damn good product which in many ways drives the world as we know it

 

[d_brennen]

You want to give 5 users with no full-time IT employee Exchange to run? And host email internally on what can at best be a business ADSL line. It's a diaster waiting to happen. SBS is such a poorly thought out solution for it's target market it's untrue.

Now if the SBS product was a combination of a locally installed server for Active Directory and acting as a local cache for cloud-hosted email services it would be a lot more suitable.

This size company is what Google Apps was made for.

I am making a rod for my back here, I know!