So does XP. Legacy hardware isn't supported by Vista. For instance my Canon digital camera was not recognised in Vista, but in XP it was.fumbles said:1. Detect a lot if not all hardware out of the box
Inconclusive as XP takes ~25 minutes to install on my machine and Vista took around the same time. However the setup was easier on Vista, I'll admit that, but not a major selling point.fumbles said:2. Much faster install time
Granted, decent feature. However it wouldn't sell me the OS.fumbles said:3. Readyboost for those who cannot afford a hardware upgrade at this point
Why's that a positive aspect? Surely that's subjective. I love XP's folder layout and infact found Vista's annoying. It kept forgetting my folder view settings.fumbles said:4. A new UI
Subjective again. In general XP's default control panel is similar to Vista's anyway.fumbles said:5. A more "user friendly" way of changing system options (which I think sucks, but I am sure people who are less technologically savvy will like it)
I don't know what less cluttered means. My XP system is neatly organised, defragged and responsive. It's easy to keep the PC tidy with XP.fumbles said:6. Things are less cluttered, but this really comes under the new UI
Like?fumbles said:7. A more intuitive way of managing things
Why's that a positive aspect for upgrading now? That'll only be useful when it's utilised.fumbles said:8. DX10
Updating what?fumbles said:9. A more refined and simpler way of updating
Such as? I can set things to automatically run on XP. You know, task scheduler?fumbles said:10. A hassle free way of maintaining you computer, as a lot of things which were previously had to be run by the user are now moved into the background and run automatically.
Granted. I'll concede on that. However I'd like to see how effective it actually is. 3ms faster opening Microsoft Word isn't something that's going to excite me.fumbles said:11. A more efficient memory management system
