While/Whilst

Soldato
Joined
2 Nov 2004
Posts
24,654
Having looked into a dictionary, it seems that these words are interchangable but I figure there must be a difference in when they can be used and what they mean...

Anyone care to offer information?
 
cleanbluesky said:
Having looked into a dictionary, it seems that these words are interchangable but I figure there must be a difference in when they can be used and what they mean...

Anyone care to offer information?

"I'm working while 2 o'clock" not whilst. :p
 
They're interchangeable, but modern (and certainly American) usage prefers "while". Most people consider "whilst" a bit old-fashioned.
 
While walking to the shops I tripped over a dog turd.

Whilst walking to the shops earlier, I tripped over a dog turd.

That's how I understand it.
 
Jonny69 said:
While walking to the shops I tripped over a dog turd.

Whilst walking to the shops earlier, I tripped over a dog turd.

That's how I understand it.

Nope, they're still interchangeable there. Both "whilst walking to the shops..." and "while walking to the shops..." are fine, as are both "while walking to the shops earlier..." and "whilst walking to the shops earlier...".
 
Jonny69 said:
While walking to the shops I tripped over a dog turd.

Whilst walking to the shops earlier, I tripped over a dog turd.

That's how I understand it.

The second sentence is missing a comma, and I dont see what precludes the need to use a whilst instead of a while
 
cleanbluesky said:
The second sentence is missing a comma, and I dont see what precludes the need to use a whilst instead of a while

It's not missing a comma :/ Where would you put one in that sentence? It would be fine without any commas, I'd probably say that the one there is unneccessary—it reads better when you write it as in the top example.
 
Grammar Nazi :p Before 'earlier', yes I can see that. That's just how I understand the word and basically I use it for variation, saves using the same word repeatedly.

Edit: everybody calm down, it was only a sentence about dog poo :eek: :D
 
Jonny69 said:
Grammar Nazi :p Before 'earlier', yes I can see that.

Nah, it's fine without. The "earlier" isn't really parenthetical, so separating it with the commas just slows down reading unneccessarily.

"I went to the shops earlier and tripped over a dog turd."

reads better than:

"I went to the shops, earlier, and tripped over a dog turd."

Edit: Sorry I'll calm down now :o
 
robmiller said:
It's not missing a comma :/ Where would you put one in that sentence? It would be fine without any commas, I'd probably say that the one there is unneccessary—it reads better when you write it as in the top example.

You're right, the 'earlier' was superfluous as the sentence already dictates that the walk was in the past.
 
Jonny69 said:
While walking to the shops I tripped over a dog turd.

Whilst walking to the shops earlier, I tripped over a dog turd.

That's how I understand it.

Did you mean...

"While walking to the shop I trip over a dog turd"

and

"Whilst walking to the shop I tripped over a dog turd"
 
cleanbluesky said:
You're right, the 'earlier' was superfluous as the sentence already dictates that the walk was in the past.

"Earlier", to me at least, implies "today" though. If someone said "I took a walk", you know it's in the past; if someone said "I took a walk earlier", I at least presume that there is an implied "today".
 
Back
Top Bottom