who uses dreamweaver for web design?

Associate
Joined
16 Jun 2003
Posts
1,858
Looking at jobs that are available, most will ask for Dreamweaver experience and Photoshop use. Sometimes some basic php or asp.

When I make as site I code it ALL. From the CSS through to the html. I find this allows me to correct alignment mistakes between IE and FF. And I can change things very quickly, even very quick by using php includes for menus, headers and footers. Although I appreciate that this takes me longer than using DW design view.

The question is to be a professional web designer is it dreamweaver or html/css coder?
 
blade007 said:
The question is to be a professional web designer is it dreamweaver or html/css coder?

I don't think it makes any difference, I know a few "professional web designers" who work for the BBC who'll use Dreamweaver and afaik as a company they're exceptionally strict with what get's released.
 
You make it sound as if a dreamweaver user is a different breed of web designer. Granted, the Design View users are, i would never use that to design my site and it often displays it wrongly anyway. I use dreamweaver as you would notepad++, i like the extra functionality there and i have FF and IE on shortcuts to check the progress.
 
We use Dreamweaver here purely as a code editor and for easy project/ftp use. Sometimes when making text changes to older sites it's a bit quicker just to go into design view and make the changes, but everything we create with it is still hand-coded.
 
I did use DW for the FTP integration but then i found crimson editor a year or so ago, this just auto saves to FTP when I want and it has all the different syntax colour schemes so i always know what I am working with :)
 
I agree with the 3 posts above. Good code view, useful to have the preview, easy ftp/testing server functionality, auto-completing code is very helpful.
 
I have been in my new job now for 9 months and I code everything myself, main reason being was I was sick of designing stuff in dreamweaver and having to fix stuff so it worked in FF/IE.

I cant stand the way dreamweaver does things - it has a habbit of adding in extra lines of code that simply isnt needed.

I would personally stick with coding everything yourself as it helped me to understand page structure and all the different css elements. It seems anyone can put together a simple site in dreamweaver these days. I know some of my younger family members are being taught how to use it at high school.

So in answer to your question it doesnt really matter as where I work people use either method to do their work but I guess it sounds better to say you can do both.
 
I originally used Dreamweaver's design view. But after learning XHTML and CSS I now use the code view.

I'm not sure what features other software has but Dreamweaver has several advantages for me.

Preview in real time;
validate markup to save going to W3C;
easy to choose padding-bottom, etc. from a drop down menu than type it out;
less chance of bad links - if you move files around it automatically updates links;
and probably some other stuff I've forgot.

As long as you use it as an aid rather than letting it do the work I don't see a problem with it.
 
Back
Top Bottom